Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5141 - 5150 of 58511 for speedy trial.
Search results 5141 - 5150 of 58511 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a trial court order terminating his parental rights to his daughter, M.W. He argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222917 - 2018-10-23
a trial court order terminating his parental rights to his daughter, M.W. He argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222917 - 2018-10-23
State v. David M. Beasley
from a judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, for delivery of a controlled substance—cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8155 - 2005-03-31
from a judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, for delivery of a controlled substance—cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8155 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Kenosha v. Ralph C. Leese
in 1987 to provide the losing party in a municipal proceeding the right to demand a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14179 - 2014-09-15
in 1987 to provide the losing party in a municipal proceeding the right to demand a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14179 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Linda J.
to their daughters, Lynda D.H. and Keshaun G.H. Linda J. claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12554 - 2017-09-21
to their daughters, Lynda D.H. and Keshaun G.H. Linda J. claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12554 - 2017-09-21
State v. Alan D. Eisenberg
. ¶1 CANE, C.J.[1] Alan Eisenberg appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3474 - 2005-03-31
. ¶1 CANE, C.J.[1] Alan Eisenberg appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3474 - 2005-03-31
Jacquelyn R. Brotherton v. Paul E. Brotherton
with Paul E. Brotherton’s argument that the trial court erred in valuing the parties’ auditing service
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12621 - 2005-03-31
with Paul E. Brotherton’s argument that the trial court erred in valuing the parties’ auditing service
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12621 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
postconviction order.[1] The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27587 - 2006-12-26
postconviction order.[1] The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27587 - 2006-12-26
State v. Lorenzo H.
to their daughters, Lynda D.H. and Keshaun G.H. Linda J. claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12748 - 2005-03-31
to their daughters, Lynda D.H. and Keshaun G.H. Linda J. claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12748 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
94 CV 380 Evelyn J. Fraser v. Daniel R. Marcussen
these claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion with respect to motions relating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11861 - 2017-09-21
these claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion with respect to motions relating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11861 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in the trial court on January 12, 2006, denying his postconviction motion for an in camera review of Kenosha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30575 - 2007-10-16
in the trial court on January 12, 2006, denying his postconviction motion for an in camera review of Kenosha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30575 - 2007-10-16