Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5141 - 5150 of 58506 for speedy trial.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
postconviction order.[1] The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27587 - 2006-12-26

[PDF] NOTICE
trial, for operating a motor vehicle with a detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56774 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Jacquelyn R. Brotherton v. Paul E. Brotherton
that the trial court erred in valuing the parties’ auditing service and reverse the judgment in part and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12621 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Lorenzo H.
to their daughters, Lynda D.H. and Keshaun G.H. Linda J. claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12748 - 2017-09-21

State v. Lorenzo H.
to their daughters, Lynda D.H. and Keshaun G.H. Linda J. claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12748 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction, entered following a jury trial, for operating a motor vehicle with a detectable amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56774 - 2010-11-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a trial court order terminating his parental rights to his daughter, M.W. He argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222917 - 2018-10-23

State v. David M. Beasley
from a judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, for delivery of a controlled substance—cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8155 - 2005-03-31

Jacquelyn R. Brotherton v. Paul E. Brotherton
with Paul E. Brotherton’s argument that the trial court erred in valuing the parties’ auditing service
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12621 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
).[1] He also appeals from the order denying his motion for a new hearing. He argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30223 - 2007-09-10