Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51431 - 51440 of 52028 for legal separation.
Search results 51431 - 51440 of 52028 for legal separation.
[PDF]
State v. Anthony J. Leitner
will be upheld on appeal when the court “reached a reasonable conclusion based on the proper legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2737 - 2017-09-19
will be upheld on appeal when the court “reached a reasonable conclusion based on the proper legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2737 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
unless clearly erroneous. Id. Whether the evidence satisfies the legal standard for protective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980091 - 2025-07-08
unless clearly erroneous. Id. Whether the evidence satisfies the legal standard for protective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980091 - 2025-07-08
State v. Liliana Petrovic
the proper legal standard. See State v. Rogers, 196 Wis.2d 817, 829, 539 N.W.2d 897, 902 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13297 - 2005-03-31
the proper legal standard. See State v. Rogers, 196 Wis.2d 817, 829, 539 N.W.2d 897, 902 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13297 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
legal standard in the exercise of its discretion or ... the facts of record fail to support the [trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616446 - 2023-01-31
legal standard in the exercise of its discretion or ... the facts of record fail to support the [trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616446 - 2023-01-31
[PDF]
Brenda Finley and Leo Finley v. David E. Culligan, M.D.
court's decision or the trial court applied the wrong legal standard. Id. at 622-23, 478 N.W.2d at 52
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8258 - 2017-09-19
court's decision or the trial court applied the wrong legal standard. Id. at 622-23, 478 N.W.2d at 52
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8258 - 2017-09-19
Time Warner, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
and against any and all claims, demands, actions, judgments, costs, appeal bond premiums, expenses, legal fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2883 - 2005-03-31
and against any and all claims, demands, actions, judgments, costs, appeal bond premiums, expenses, legal fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2883 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
application of the appropriate legal standard to the relevant facts of the case. Id. at 280-81. ¶30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51802 - 2010-07-13
application of the appropriate legal standard to the relevant facts of the case. Id. at 280-81. ¶30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51802 - 2010-07-13
COURT OF APPEALS
propensity evidence “‘is not legally or logically relevant to the crime charged.’” See Muckerheide, 298 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132817 - 2015-01-12
propensity evidence “‘is not legally or logically relevant to the crime charged.’” See Muckerheide, 298 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132817 - 2015-01-12
Robert A. Benkoski v. Mark A. Flood
if the court “employs a logical rationale based on the appropriate legal principles and facts of record.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2585 - 2005-03-31
if the court “employs a logical rationale based on the appropriate legal principles and facts of record.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2585 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is objectively biased is a mixed question of fact and law” but, because the legal conclusion is so intertwined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176504 - 2017-09-21
is objectively biased is a mixed question of fact and law” but, because the legal conclusion is so intertwined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176504 - 2017-09-21