Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51461 - 51470 of 59782 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 51461 - 51470 of 59782 for quit claim deed/1000.
State v. Ronnie A. Malloy
admitted stabbing two youths with a steak knife. Id. at 253. At trial, the defendant claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17858 - 2005-04-26
admitted stabbing two youths with a steak knife. Id. at 253. At trial, the defendant claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17858 - 2005-04-26
State v. Zenobia W.
claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in terminating her rights because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6864 - 2005-03-31
claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in terminating her rights because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6864 - 2005-03-31
Christopher King v. Sonia G. King
held on January 5, 1996. He claims that the summons served on Sonia gave her notice that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12316 - 2005-03-31
held on January 5, 1996. He claims that the summons served on Sonia gave her notice that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12316 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
estoppel. ¶9 The Department also makes arguments based on issue preclusion or claim preclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51818 - 2010-07-07
estoppel. ¶9 The Department also makes arguments based on issue preclusion or claim preclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51818 - 2010-07-07
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
schedule in 2011. In 2023, David filed the motion underlying this appeal. Claiming that Susanna never
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003658 - 2025-09-03
schedule in 2011. In 2023, David filed the motion underlying this appeal. Claiming that Susanna never
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003658 - 2025-09-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentencing argument under the guise of a legally unaccepted science.” Moreover, Perekovich’s claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597720 - 2022-12-06
sentencing argument under the guise of a legally unaccepted science.” Moreover, Perekovich’s claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597720 - 2022-12-06
COURT OF APPEALS
obtained by the State was not unconstitutionally overbroad. We reject Huber’s claims and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93392 - 2013-03-05
obtained by the State was not unconstitutionally overbroad. We reject Huber’s claims and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93392 - 2013-03-05
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Flick
correctly rejected his claim. Therefore, we affirm the amended judgment and order. In 1994, upon his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14844 - 2017-09-21
correctly rejected his claim. Therefore, we affirm the amended judgment and order. In 1994, upon his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14844 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Margaret J. Magnant v. Richard K. Hand
. The parties then filed briefs outlining their claims. Magnant argued that she had rebutted the § 700.20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13589 - 2017-09-21
. The parties then filed briefs outlining their claims. Magnant argued that she had rebutted the § 700.20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13589 - 2017-09-21
State v. William Gunderson
representation at the plea and sentencing hearing. Nor did Gunderson claim that the attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4983 - 2005-03-31
representation at the plea and sentencing hearing. Nor did Gunderson claim that the attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4983 - 2005-03-31