Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51491 - 51500 of 74688 for public records.
Search results 51491 - 51500 of 74688 for public records.
Julie A. Haslbeck v. Darren Haslbeck
the relevant law to the facts of record and reaches a reasonable decision. Id. “[W]here there has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9162 - 2005-03-31
the relevant law to the facts of record and reaches a reasonable decision. Id. “[W]here there has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9162 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
John J. Castellano v. Gary R. McCaughtry
), Castellano petitioned the warden to “correct” his inmate records by removing all references to “multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7398 - 2017-09-20
), Castellano petitioned the warden to “correct” his inmate records by removing all references to “multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7398 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Sherman Williams
-4- of record in light of the applicable law and, therefore, does not constitute an erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9024 - 2017-09-19
-4- of record in light of the applicable law and, therefore, does not constitute an erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9024 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders, this court concludes that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1091321 - 2026-03-17
review of the record as mandated by Anders, this court concludes that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1091321 - 2026-03-17
State v. Randy J. Stahl
restitution hearings, the only restitution order in the record is for $965, which the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26339 - 2006-08-30
restitution hearings, the only restitution order in the record is for $965, which the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26339 - 2006-08-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not to do so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219111 - 2018-09-19
not to do so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219111 - 2018-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record, as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263730 - 2020-06-09
review of the record, as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263730 - 2020-06-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2024AP205-CRNM 2 upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886969 - 2024-12-10
. No. 2024AP205-CRNM 2 upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886969 - 2024-12-10
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98002 - 2014-09-15
a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98002 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Randy J. Stahl
2003 restitution hearings, the only restitution order in the record is for $965, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26339 - 2017-09-21
2003 restitution hearings, the only restitution order in the record is for $965, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26339 - 2017-09-21