Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5151 - 5160 of 69078 for as he.
Search results 5151 - 5160 of 69078 for as he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction and the denial of his postconviction motion for a new trial after he was convicted of one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164929 - 2017-09-21
of conviction and the denial of his postconviction motion for a new trial after he was convicted of one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164929 - 2017-09-21
State v. Daniel E. La Fave
and an order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. He argues that his pleas were not knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8695 - 2005-03-31
and an order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. He argues that his pleas were not knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8695 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the influence (OWI) as a fifth offense. He contends that there was insufficient evidence to support his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841908 - 2024-08-28
the influence (OWI) as a fifth offense. He contends that there was insufficient evidence to support his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841908 - 2024-08-28
[PDF]
State v. David A. Kelly
postconviction motion to vacate a no contest plea. He contends that the trial court accepted the plea without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7764 - 2017-09-19
postconviction motion to vacate a no contest plea. He contends that the trial court accepted the plea without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7764 - 2017-09-19
State v. David Womble
on Womble’s guilty plea. In his postconviction motion, Womble sought to withdraw that plea because he entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11158 - 2005-03-31
on Womble’s guilty plea. In his postconviction motion, Womble sought to withdraw that plea because he entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11158 - 2005-03-31
State v. William J. Foley
. See §§ 77.60(11), 943.20, Stats. He appeals. We affirm. I. ¶2 The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15754 - 2005-03-31
. See §§ 77.60(11), 943.20, Stats. He appeals. We affirm. I. ¶2 The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15754 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William J. Foley
from customers of his restaurant. See §§ 77.60(11), 943.20, STATS. He appeals. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15754 - 2017-09-21
from customers of his restaurant. See §§ 77.60(11), 943.20, STATS. He appeals. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15754 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[1] He argues that the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28100 - 2007-02-12
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[1] He argues that the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28100 - 2007-02-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
that occurred after the formation of the contract. He argues that these claims are based only on his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44980 - 2014-09-15
that occurred after the formation of the contract. He argues that these claims are based only on his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44980 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the influence (OWI) as a fifth offense. He contends that there was insufficient evidence to support his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841908 - 2024-08-28
the influence (OWI) as a fifth offense. He contends that there was insufficient evidence to support his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841908 - 2024-08-28