Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5151 - 5160 of 16451 for commentating.
Search results 5151 - 5160 of 16451 for commentating.
[PDF]
NOTICE
for failing to object to the prosecutor’s repeated comments during closing argument that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28982 - 2014-09-15
for failing to object to the prosecutor’s repeated comments during closing argument that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28982 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Mark D. Pett
commented that it had reviewed the prior conviction and concluded it was not sufficiently similar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5726 - 2017-09-19
commented that it had reviewed the prior conviction and concluded it was not sufficiently similar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5726 - 2017-09-19
State v. Eugene F. Line
months and three months, for a total of six months” in the county jail. Line, himself, did not comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13964 - 2005-03-31
months and three months, for a total of six months” in the county jail. Line, himself, did not comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13964 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
contends the court applied the wrong standard of law, relying on the court’s comment stating that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33493 - 2008-07-28
contends the court applied the wrong standard of law, relying on the court’s comment stating that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33493 - 2008-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS
, “The common theme that I heard from him is you don’t have time for him.” The court also commented on Jami’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42693 - 2009-10-26
, “The common theme that I heard from him is you don’t have time for him.” The court also commented on Jami’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42693 - 2009-10-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, attributes this comment to the sentencing court. In reality, it was a comment by the assistant district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134619 - 2017-09-21
, attributes this comment to the sentencing court. In reality, it was a comment by the assistant district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134619 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, as evidenced by various comments he made throughout the litigation expenses hearing. They argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137854 - 2015-03-18
, as evidenced by various comments he made throughout the litigation expenses hearing. They argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137854 - 2015-03-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.) The circuit court’s order then addressed the brief comments it made at sentencing concerning the possible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86665 - 2014-09-15
.) The circuit court’s order then addressed the brief comments it made at sentencing concerning the possible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86665 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to pursuing the other potential defects. Counsel was specifically directed to comment on the fact
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123504 - 2017-09-21
to pursuing the other potential defects. Counsel was specifically directed to comment on the fact
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123504 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
unsatisfying.[3] It commented that the judge who had authorized the deferred prosecution agreement had taken
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97263 - 2013-05-20
unsatisfying.[3] It commented that the judge who had authorized the deferred prosecution agreement had taken
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97263 - 2013-05-20