Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5151 - 5160 of 30142 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review an order granting summary judgment de novo. Palisades Collection LLC v. Kalal, 2010 WI App 38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=349448 - 2021-03-25

[PDF] WI APP 41
and Applicable Law ¶10 The standard of review for questions of summary judgment is de novo. Goudy v. Yamaha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79489 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Nathaniel Crampton
review de novo. See State v. Harris, 199 Wis.2d 227, 256–263, 544 N.W.2d 545, 557–559 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13383 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law that are reviewed de novo. See State v. Alger, 2015 WI 3, ¶21, 360 Wis. 2d 193, 858 N.W.2d 346
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229978 - 2018-12-11

Barron Electric Cooperative v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
to serve the duplex through a secondary extension. The circuit court disagreed. Employing a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12077 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous. State v. Thiel, 2003 WI 111, ¶21, 264 Wis. 2d 571, 665 N.W.2d 305. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186889 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
the disposition of a motion for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology the circuit courts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237774 - 2019-05-30

[PDF] WI App 3
decision and the case was disposed of on summary judgment, which we review de novo. See McAdams v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251487 - 2020-02-12

[PDF] City of Pewaukee v. Thomas L. Carter
: "[A] motion made at the close of the plaintiff's case does not allow for a trial de novo in the circuit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16780 - 2017-09-21

CenturyTel of the Midwest-Kendall, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
, which are questions of law, subject to our de novo review. Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Pub. Serv. Comm’n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4810 - 2005-03-31