Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5151 - 5160 of 29928 for des.
Search results 5151 - 5160 of 29928 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Fawcett, 145 Wis. 2d 244, 250, 426 N.W.2d 91 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139074 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Fawcett, 145 Wis. 2d 244, 250, 426 N.W.2d 91 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139074 - 2017-09-21
WTMJ, Inc. v. Michael J. Sullivan
is documentary, we review the document de novo. Racine Educ. Ass'n v. Board of Educ., 145 Wis.2d 518, 521, 427
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10213 - 2005-03-31
is documentary, we review the document de novo. Racine Educ. Ass'n v. Board of Educ., 145 Wis.2d 518, 521, 427
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10213 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
examiner’s decision on attorney’s fees is de novo. We are uncertain whether this concession is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137250 - 2015-03-11
examiner’s decision on attorney’s fees is de novo. We are uncertain whether this concession is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137250 - 2015-03-11
Christina Holman v. Family Health Plan
of law, and we review the trial court’s determination de novo. See Anderson, 160 Wis.2d at 397, 466 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12517 - 2005-03-31
of law, and we review the trial court’s determination de novo. See Anderson, 160 Wis.2d at 397, 466 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12517 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mary G. Sevcik v. Secura Insurance Company
de novo. Katze v. Randolph & Scott Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 116 Wis. 2d 206, 212, 341 N.W.2d 689 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2880 - 2017-09-19
de novo. Katze v. Randolph & Scott Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 116 Wis. 2d 206, 212, 341 N.W.2d 689 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2880 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Dunn County Department of Human Services v. LaMoine S.
and interpretation of a statute and its application to the facts present a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10997 - 2017-09-19
and interpretation of a statute and its application to the facts present a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10997 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
court, and instead review the issue de novo. See Cohn v. Town of Randall, 2001 WI App 176, ¶5, 247 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63471 - 2012-02-19
court, and instead review the issue de novo. See Cohn v. Town of Randall, 2001 WI App 176, ¶5, 247 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63471 - 2012-02-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
)). Whether a defendant has alleged sufficient facts is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=443045 - 2021-10-19
)). Whether a defendant has alleged sufficient facts is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=443045 - 2021-10-19
Lawrence Turkow v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
judgment. SUMMARY JUDGMENT We review a summary judgment decision de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12383 - 2005-03-31
judgment. SUMMARY JUDGMENT We review a summary judgment decision de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12383 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Smith
of a lesser- included offense is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Kramar, 149 Wis.2d 767
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10827 - 2017-09-20
of a lesser- included offense is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Kramar, 149 Wis.2d 767
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10827 - 2017-09-20