Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5151 - 5160 of 7574 for yes.
Search results 5151 - 5160 of 7574 for yes.
COURT OF APPEALS
were negligent from “yes” to “no.” After making this change, the court postponed its hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30240 - 2007-09-10
were negligent from “yes” to “no.” After making this change, the court postponed its hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30240 - 2007-09-10
State v. Scott A. Heimermann
. The supreme court answered “yes” and held that the second postconviction claim would be barred. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10013 - 2005-03-31
. The supreme court answered “yes” and held that the second postconviction claim would be barred. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10013 - 2005-03-31
State v. Fred J. Odell
. Although Evans answered "yes" to the question regarding whether that condition was in effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9273 - 2005-03-31
. Although Evans answered "yes" to the question regarding whether that condition was in effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9273 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bobby G. Grant
of the law,” Grant answered “yes.” Grant acknowledged that he had not been forced, coerced or threatened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14340 - 2013-07-10
of the law,” Grant answered “yes.” Grant acknowledged that he had not been forced, coerced or threatened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14340 - 2013-07-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
believed those phone records would be helpful to the defense, trial counsel replied, “yes and no.” Trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=629636 - 2023-03-07
believed those phone records would be helpful to the defense, trial counsel replied, “yes and no.” Trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=629636 - 2023-03-07
[PDF]
WI APP 159
, “Yes.” Nonetheless, when the court then asked whether she knew what disposition meant, she replied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34172 - 2014-09-15
, “Yes.” Nonetheless, when the court then asked whether she knew what disposition meant, she replied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34172 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of your punishment, yes; but it’s also part of your rehabilitation to the extent that you’re gonna
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202540 - 2017-11-13
of your punishment, yes; but it’s also part of your rehabilitation to the extent that you’re gonna
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202540 - 2017-11-13
[PDF]
State v. Paula Oltrogge
to submit to chemical testing, she “hesitated for a minute … collected [her] thoughts, and … said yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15423 - 2017-09-21
to submit to chemical testing, she “hesitated for a minute … collected [her] thoughts, and … said yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15423 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ronald J. Lubinski
if he had been involved in an accident that evening. Lubinski replied “yes,” and Staff informed him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15009 - 2017-09-21
if he had been involved in an accident that evening. Lubinski replied “yes,” and Staff informed him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15009 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Katherine Kaatz v. Tommy E. Hamilton
give her his construction business? The jury answered "yes," creating an ambiguity. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10335 - 2017-09-20
give her his construction business? The jury answered "yes," creating an ambiguity. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10335 - 2017-09-20