Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51511 - 51520 of 60860 for affidavit of service forms.

[PDF] State v. Robert J. Defliger
County, thus abrogating constitutional and statutory prohibitions against double jeopardy in the form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4277 - 2017-09-19

Renee K. VanCleve v. City of Marinette
codified the ordinances in statutory form. A statute was enacted containing “almost verbatim the language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3540 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
‘explicit attention’ so ‘specific consideration’ to it, or that the misinformation ‘formed part
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163025 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 15
, under all the circumstances, that the actor formed that intent and would commit the crime except
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92339 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Alvin M. Moore
in the form of the letters to Theresa. Granted, in those letters Mr. Moore asked and/or directed that both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24521 - 2017-09-21

State v. George A. Faucher
in the courtroom. He had formed this opinion based on his extensive contact with her outside the courtroom. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13028 - 2005-03-31

WI App 133 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP2372-CR Complete Titl...
-provoking conduct and physical violence. Id. at 559 (footnote omitted). The court noted that, unlike forms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89025 - 2013-11-17

State v. Glenn E. Davis
affirmative defense/burden of proof approach elevates form over substance. See United States v. Halbert, 712
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3197 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Harry L. Seymer
and in no event more than 60 days after the cause has been submitted in final form. Here, the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17655 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Certification
the Accused form verbatim” to the inert Mitchell. Mitchell did not respond. Because of Mitchell’s “unusual
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190486 - 2017-09-21