Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51511 - 51520 of 82626 for simple case.

Town of East Troy v. Village of East Troy
time limits, moved to dismiss the case on summary judgment. The circuit court granted relief, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19731 - 2005-09-27

Public Safety and Justice Committee of the Rock County Board of Supervisors v.
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1621
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12577 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael R. Nelson
teenage girls. In each case, Nelson gave drugs and alcohol to the girls and then sexually assaulted them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2736 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133858 - 2015-02-03

Archie F. Lange v. Ronald Tumm
2000 WI App 160 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16309 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Kenneth Haug
to California. The trial court observed that the case turned almost exclusively on the issue of credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10018 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
or ordinance is alleged to be unconstitutional on its face or as applied in a particular case. B.P., 386 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601184 - 2022-12-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
The Consolidated Court Automation Programs (CCAP) is a case management system that “provides public access online
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196746 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
to the children. And in this case that would be on its face the way to go since the parties are splitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89039 - 2012-11-05

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 17, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
the plaintiff’s claim is not relevant to this appeal. We affirm the judgment. Background ¶2 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27815 - 2007-01-16