Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51521 - 51530 of 98601 for court records search online.
Search results 51521 - 51530 of 98601 for court records search online.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of indigency, at least not according to the record before this court. Moreover, Phiffer has not filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980930 - 2025-07-10
of indigency, at least not according to the record before this court. Moreover, Phiffer has not filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980930 - 2025-07-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
agreed that they all were. We agree that the record supports the postconviction court’s conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32278 - 2014-09-15
agreed that they all were. We agree that the record supports the postconviction court’s conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32278 - 2014-09-15
Teresa L. v. Sauk County
). In our opinion, we noted that "[t]he record supports the circuit court's implied conclusion that just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8100 - 2005-03-31
). In our opinion, we noted that "[t]he record supports the circuit court's implied conclusion that just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8100 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Teresa L. v. Sauk County
that "[t]he record supports the circuit court's implied conclusion that just before he went to Florida
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8100 - 2017-09-19
that "[t]he record supports the circuit court's implied conclusion that just before he went to Florida
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8100 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a challenge to the court’s decision as to Bunnell’s ERP eligibility. Our review of the record reveals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152323 - 2017-09-21
to a challenge to the court’s decision as to Bunnell’s ERP eligibility. Our review of the record reveals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152323 - 2017-09-21
Teresa L. v. Sauk County
). In our opinion, we noted that "[t]he record supports the circuit court's implied conclusion that just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7905 - 2005-03-31
). In our opinion, we noted that "[t]he record supports the circuit court's implied conclusion that just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7905 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jerold L. Rober
., ¶18, the circuit court must articulate the basis of the sentence on the record, McCleary v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21028 - 2017-09-21
., ¶18, the circuit court must articulate the basis of the sentence on the record, McCleary v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21028 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Hollywood Livestock, Inc. v. Andrew Pitzer
discretionary authority to reverse the trial court “if it appears from the record that the real controversy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6646 - 2017-09-20
discretionary authority to reverse the trial court “if it appears from the record that the real controversy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6646 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Biersdorf & Associates v. Spire Capital Corporation
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 21, 2004 Cornelia G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7201 - 2017-09-20
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 21, 2004 Cornelia G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7201 - 2017-09-20
Biersdorf & Associates v. Spire Capital Corporation
appeal from that judgment, this court concluded that the record supported Biersdorf’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7201 - 2005-03-31
appeal from that judgment, this court concluded that the record supported Biersdorf’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7201 - 2005-03-31