Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51531 - 51540 of 56003 for so.
Search results 51531 - 51540 of 56003 for so.
State v. William A. Spring
: J. MAC DAVIS so indicate) JUDGES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10157 - 2005-03-31
: J. MAC DAVIS so indicate) JUDGES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10157 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
both challenges in its brief; so in the interest of judicial economy we will address both challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35714 - 2014-09-15
both challenges in its brief; so in the interest of judicial economy we will address both challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35714 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the contract between the parties. Without clearly stating so, Tex-Mach appears to suggest the invoice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141255 - 2017-09-21
the contract between the parties. Without clearly stating so, Tex-Mach appears to suggest the invoice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141255 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gary L. Kluck
is a “new factor” in the case of a defendant sentenced to county jail, this court did not do so. State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17050 - 2017-09-21
is a “new factor” in the case of a defendant sentenced to county jail, this court did not do so. State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17050 - 2017-09-21
State v. Roosevelt Bennett
to petition the court for conditional release, he may still do so under § 971.17(4). By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4902 - 2005-03-31
to petition the court for conditional release, he may still do so under § 971.17(4). By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4902 - 2005-03-31
State v. Matthew D.
discretion. State v. C.W., 142 Wis.2d 763, 769, 419 N.W.2d 327, 329-30 (Ct. App. 1987). It did not do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13399 - 2005-03-31
discretion. State v. C.W., 142 Wis.2d 763, 769, 419 N.W.2d 327, 329-30 (Ct. App. 1987). It did not do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13399 - 2005-03-31
State v. James A. Tanksley
to proceed pro se. It appears that he wishes to represent himself at trial. If so, he should make a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16289 - 2005-03-31
to proceed pro se. It appears that he wishes to represent himself at trial. If so, he should make a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16289 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a “4.” Trinidad argues that first-offense OWI is not a criminal offense in Wisconsin so probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33708 - 2008-08-12
a “4.” Trinidad argues that first-offense OWI is not a criminal offense in Wisconsin so probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33708 - 2008-08-12
State v. Roosevelt Manuel
for Manuel still maintained that under the unusual facts of this case, probable cause was so clear against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11314 - 2005-03-31
for Manuel still maintained that under the unusual facts of this case, probable cause was so clear against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11314 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in case No. 2005CF63 do not designate some sentences as “A-01” and others as “B-02,” so the discharge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125534 - 2017-09-21
in case No. 2005CF63 do not designate some sentences as “A-01” and others as “B-02,” so the discharge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125534 - 2017-09-21