Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51551 - 51560 of 59547 for do.

State v. Jeffrey J. Beardsley
and Fields to join him and using his criminal experience as an inducement to do so. The State argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10596 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Robert J. Turicik
, and (2) that the person was doing so while under the influence of intoxicants. No. 95-3241
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10003 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 117
[]” of “ultimate manufacture or delivery.” See id. at 354-55. As we shall see, in this case we do not add
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28360 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
his eligibility to participate in those programs. 2 In so doing, the court referred to its general
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234056 - 2019-02-06

State v. Ventae Parrow
was extremely favorable to the defendant and, after doing so, his attorney then argued for a lesser sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14988 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jesse S.
determining now. What I’m going to do now, hopefully, is open the door so he can get some stability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12382 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
joined in that motion, and Leonard makes no effort to explain why he did not do so.[4] As noted above
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50732 - 2010-06-07

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and the things he’ll do, in order to obtain the result he wants,” and explained that it considered London’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170640 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
it promised not to do directly, and it may not covertly convey to the [circuit] court that a more severe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110255 - 2014-04-14

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
5 We do not reach the merits of any of the owners’ claims regarding the sufficiency
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95823 - 2014-09-15