Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51591 - 51600 of 57669 for id.
Search results 51591 - 51600 of 57669 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
to review a trial court’s credibility determinations in such cases. Id. at 250. Thus, we accept the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29589 - 2007-07-04
to review a trial court’s credibility determinations in such cases. Id. at 250. Thus, we accept the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29589 - 2007-07-04
State v. Tracy L. Singleton
)]. If the motion raises such facts, the [trial] court must hold an evidentiary hearing. Id. at 310; Nelson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26300 - 2006-08-28
)]. If the motion raises such facts, the [trial] court must hold an evidentiary hearing. Id. at 310; Nelson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26300 - 2006-08-28
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. The physical possession must be hostile, open and notorious, exclusive and continuous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33861 - 2008-09-02
. Id. The physical possession must be hostile, open and notorious, exclusive and continuous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33861 - 2008-09-02
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circumstances.” Id. (citations omitted). ¶6 At the remand hearing, Morales testified that Arvan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33902 - 2008-09-02
of the circumstances.” Id. (citations omitted). ¶6 At the remand hearing, Morales testified that Arvan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33902 - 2008-09-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
a sufficient reason for failing to raise the issue is presented. Id. “[D]ue process for a convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28922 - 2014-09-15
a sufficient reason for failing to raise the issue is presented. Id. “[D]ue process for a convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28922 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the plea. Id., ¶12. Consequently, there is no arguable merit to a claim for plea withdrawal based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218632 - 2018-09-05
of the plea. Id., ¶12. Consequently, there is no arguable merit to a claim for plea withdrawal based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218632 - 2018-09-05
[PDF]
State v. Tyler W. P.
of another witness even though their testimony, read as a whole, may be inconsistent. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4198 - 2017-09-19
of another witness even though their testimony, read as a whole, may be inconsistent. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4198 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Marlene A. Freitag v. Scott D. Freitag
standards to reach a reasonable determination. See id. at 215-16, 343 N.W.2d at 804. And, while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13757 - 2014-09-15
standards to reach a reasonable determination. See id. at 215-16, 343 N.W.2d at 804. And, while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13757 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
probability is one that undermines our confidence in the outcome. Id. at 694. ¶6 London first argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46797 - 2010-02-08
probability is one that undermines our confidence in the outcome. Id. at 694. ¶6 London first argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46797 - 2010-02-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
in the context of the policy’s other language.” Id., ¶28. ¶6 Hinz argues the policy is contextually ambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34404 - 2014-09-15
in the context of the policy’s other language.” Id., ¶28. ¶6 Hinz argues the policy is contextually ambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34404 - 2014-09-15