Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5161 - 5170 of 16418 for commentating.
Search results 5161 - 5170 of 16418 for commentating.
[PDF]
Patrick McDonough v. Alan J. Muetzelburg
, commenting that it thought it could adjourn a decision on the motions “for purposes of having a transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14297 - 2014-09-15
, commenting that it thought it could adjourn a decision on the motions “for purposes of having a transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14297 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
.) The circuit court’s order then addressed the brief comments it made at sentencing concerning the possible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86665 - 2012-09-04
.) The circuit court’s order then addressed the brief comments it made at sentencing concerning the possible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86665 - 2012-09-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for a mistrial. Second, he argues that the admission of a police officer’s testimony that commented on another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=451553 - 2021-11-11
for a mistrial. Second, he argues that the admission of a police officer’s testimony that commented on another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=451553 - 2021-11-11
State v. Patricia K.S.
filed her motion for postconviction relief, October 18, 1995, the circuit court commented that “I am
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10638 - 2005-03-31
filed her motion for postconviction relief, October 18, 1995, the circuit court commented that “I am
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10638 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
comments that it believed Jurjens knew exactly what he was doing when he entered his pleas, and from its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103623 - 2017-09-21
comments that it believed Jurjens knew exactly what he was doing when he entered his pleas, and from its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103623 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to determine whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the prosecutor’s repeated comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28982 - 2007-06-26
to determine whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the prosecutor’s repeated comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28982 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, attributes this comment to the sentencing court. In reality, it was a comment by the assistant district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134619 - 2017-09-21
, attributes this comment to the sentencing court. In reality, it was a comment by the assistant district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134619 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
only a single page of transcript in his appendix, attributes this comment to the sentencing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134619 - 2015-02-09
only a single page of transcript in his appendix, attributes this comment to the sentencing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134619 - 2015-02-09
Roberta K. Long v. Russell S. Long
of the record satisfies us that the trial court, by its comments on the depletion of the accounts, appropriately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8136 - 2005-03-31
of the record satisfies us that the trial court, by its comments on the depletion of the accounts, appropriately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8136 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
the issue, if there were one. Fulsom next alleges prosecutorial vindictiveness based on a comment defense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104324 - 2013-11-19
the issue, if there were one. Fulsom next alleges prosecutorial vindictiveness based on a comment defense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104324 - 2013-11-19