Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5161 - 5170 of 16425 for commenting.
Search results 5161 - 5170 of 16425 for commenting.
[PDF]
Columbia County Department of Human Services v. Robert L. W.
[is] not in their best interest and it is clearly contrary to their welfare.” The circuit court commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6038 - 2017-09-19
[is] not in their best interest and it is clearly contrary to their welfare.” The circuit court commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6038 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.) The circuit court’s order then addressed the brief comments it made at sentencing concerning the possible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86665 - 2014-09-15
.) The circuit court’s order then addressed the brief comments it made at sentencing concerning the possible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86665 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony that her only comment on reading the draft was to point out that her name had been misspelled. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101602 - 2013-09-04
testimony that her only comment on reading the draft was to point out that her name had been misspelled. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101602 - 2013-09-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
comment a total restitution figure that wildly exceeded the total amount of No. 2006AP3123-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30744 - 2014-09-15
comment a total restitution figure that wildly exceeded the total amount of No. 2006AP3123-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30744 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to determine whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the prosecutor’s repeated comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28982 - 2007-06-26
to determine whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the prosecutor’s repeated comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28982 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
State v. Mark D. Pett
commented that it had reviewed the prior conviction and concluded it was not sufficiently similar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5726 - 2017-09-19
commented that it had reviewed the prior conviction and concluded it was not sufficiently similar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5726 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Martin asserts that, when a sentencing court’s after-the-fact comments during a postconviction hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107102 - 2017-09-21
. Martin asserts that, when a sentencing court’s after-the-fact comments during a postconviction hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107102 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Scott F. Anderson v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
, the legislative committee commented: “This section recognizes the inherent authority of a court of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11699 - 2017-09-20
, the legislative committee commented: “This section recognizes the inherent authority of a court of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11699 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
worn by the perpetrator during the robbery; and (2) relying on the State’s sentencing comments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190816 - 2017-09-21
worn by the perpetrator during the robbery; and (2) relying on the State’s sentencing comments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190816 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was not improperly commenting on E.G.’s credibility as a witness. In any event, as the party who sought to elicit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272887 - 2020-08-05
was not improperly commenting on E.G.’s credibility as a witness. In any event, as the party who sought to elicit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272887 - 2020-08-05