Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5161 - 5170 of 29929 for des.
Search results 5161 - 5170 of 29929 for des.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
deficiency was prejudicial are both questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876429 - 2024-11-19
deficiency was prejudicial are both questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876429 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
3, 4 N.W.3d 908. “Appellate courts review a grant of summary judgment de novo using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815731 - 2024-06-19
3, 4 N.W.3d 908. “Appellate courts review a grant of summary judgment de novo using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815731 - 2024-06-19
[PDF]
Clark County v. Michael C. Collins
is permanently waived. ¶9 The interpretation of statutes is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7542 - 2017-09-19
is permanently waived. ¶9 The interpretation of statutes is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7542 - 2017-09-19
Kimberly Kirwin Holum v. General Motors Corporation
a de novo standard of review. See Rhiel v. Wisconsin County Mut. Ins. Corp., 212 Wis.2d 46, 51, 568
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13124 - 2005-03-31
a de novo standard of review. See Rhiel v. Wisconsin County Mut. Ins. Corp., 212 Wis.2d 46, 51, 568
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13124 - 2005-03-31
State v. Johnnie Phiffer
, and we review the postconviction court’s decision de novo. See Bahr v. State Inv. Bd., 186 Wis.2d 379
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14410 - 2005-03-31
, and we review the postconviction court’s decision de novo. See Bahr v. State Inv. Bd., 186 Wis.2d 379
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14410 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
consider the matter de novo because the judge who presided over the postconviction motion did not preside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58995 - 2011-01-18
consider the matter de novo because the judge who presided over the postconviction motion did not preside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58995 - 2011-01-18
[PDF]
Charles R. and Marybelle Bentley v. City of Madison
for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology and standards as the trial court. See Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14569 - 2017-09-21
for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology and standards as the trial court. See Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14569 - 2017-09-21
Dunn County Department of Human Services v. LaMoine S.
we review de novo. State v. Keith, 175 Wis.2d 75, 78, 498 N.W.2d 865, 866 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10997 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. State v. Keith, 175 Wis.2d 75, 78, 498 N.W.2d 865, 866 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10997 - 2005-03-31
Clark County v. Michael C. Collins
. ¶9 The interpretation of statutes is a question of law, which we review de novo. Evers v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7542 - 2005-03-31
. ¶9 The interpretation of statutes is a question of law, which we review de novo. Evers v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7542 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kramer Business Service, Inc. v. Hyperion, Inc.
Chapter 799. The case was first heard by a court commissioner, and then tried de novo to the court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2976 - 2017-09-19
Chapter 799. The case was first heard by a court commissioner, and then tried de novo to the court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2976 - 2017-09-19