Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5161 - 5170 of 21546 for warrants.
Search results 5161 - 5170 of 21546 for warrants.
COURT OF APPEALS
the proper sentencing factors when it concluded that the maximum time was warranted. In rejecting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129299 - 2014-11-24
the proper sentencing factors when it concluded that the maximum time was warranted. In rejecting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129299 - 2014-11-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
”—their challenge presented “a huge uphill battle.” The court concluded that a performance bond was warranted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333141 - 2021-02-09
”—their challenge presented “a huge uphill battle.” The court concluded that a performance bond was warranted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333141 - 2021-02-09
COURT OF APPEALS
therefrom, reasonably warrant a suspicion that an offense has occurred or will occur.” State v. Longcore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31947 - 2008-02-27
therefrom, reasonably warrant a suspicion that an offense has occurred or will occur.” State v. Longcore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31947 - 2008-02-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
and that this constitutes a new factor warranting sentence reduction. This argument fails. ¶12 A defendant claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57484 - 2014-09-15
and that this constitutes a new factor warranting sentence reduction. This argument fails. ¶12 A defendant claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57484 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Prentiss M. McKinnie
principles for determining when a defendant’s acts are sufficiently different in fact to warrant multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4489 - 2017-09-19
principles for determining when a defendant’s acts are sufficiently different in fact to warrant multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4489 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Charles Johnson
that a five-year sentence was warranted for a man whose probation was revoked for “strikingly familiar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21022 - 2017-09-21
that a five-year sentence was warranted for a man whose probation was revoked for “strikingly familiar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21022 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in Milwaukee, Wisconsin to execute an arrest warrant for Martin. A perimeter team, which included an officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250510 - 2019-11-19
in Milwaukee, Wisconsin to execute an arrest warrant for Martin. A perimeter team, which included an officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250510 - 2019-11-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and arrest an individual without a warrant when the officer has reasonable grounds to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241304 - 2019-05-29
and arrest an individual without a warrant when the officer has reasonable grounds to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241304 - 2019-05-29
State v. Ronald L. Dantuma
with respect to a suspect’s Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination which would warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15492 - 2005-03-31
with respect to a suspect’s Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination which would warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15492 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher V. Teague
, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” These facts must be judged against an “objective standard: would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4594 - 2005-03-31
, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” These facts must be judged against an “objective standard: would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4594 - 2005-03-31