Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51611 - 51620 of 83988 for simple case search.
Search results 51611 - 51620 of 83988 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to consider the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to this case. See generally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152750 - 2017-09-21
to consider the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to this case. See generally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152750 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Shaun T. Nichols
decide this case based on the prejudice prong of the ineffective assistance analysis. In so doing, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19598 - 2017-09-21
decide this case based on the prejudice prong of the ineffective assistance analysis. In so doing, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19598 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=702295 - 2023-09-13
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=702295 - 2023-09-13
State v. Lou Ann Disch
, it is not the approach or the innocuous question that represents the seizure in this case. Rather, it is the officer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5334 - 2005-03-31
, it is not the approach or the innocuous question that represents the seizure in this case. Rather, it is the officer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5334 - 2005-03-31
State v. Andrae T. D'Acquisto
an arrow into his quiver[4] and then put his bow and his quiver ... in a case.” Drake approached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16118 - 2005-03-31
an arrow into his quiver[4] and then put his bow and his quiver ... in a case.” Drake approached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16118 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to the County’s current case because the court had dismissed the previous case without prejudice. Specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92698 - 2013-02-11
to the County’s current case because the court had dismissed the previous case without prejudice. Specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92698 - 2013-02-11
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030507 - 2025-10-29
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030507 - 2025-10-29
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030507 - 2025-10-29
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030507 - 2025-10-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). The “‘sentence imposed in each case should call for the minimum amount of custody or confinement which
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155859 - 2017-09-21
). The “‘sentence imposed in each case should call for the minimum amount of custody or confinement which
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155859 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate No. 2016AP1843-CR 2 for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196875 - 2017-09-21
at conference that this case is appropriate No. 2016AP1843-CR 2 for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196875 - 2017-09-21