Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51641 - 51650 of 83139 for simple case search.
Search results 51641 - 51650 of 83139 for simple case search.
State v. Richard G. White
2004 WI App 78 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-1132-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6424 - 2005-03-31
2004 WI App 78 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-1132-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6424 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
W.T. Corporation v. The Town of Waukesha
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7815 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7815 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the CHIPS orders. ¶5 M.W. contested the allegations in the petitions, and the case proceeded to a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004306 - 2025-09-03
by the CHIPS orders. ¶5 M.W. contested the allegations in the petitions, and the case proceeded to a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004306 - 2025-09-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
[Adam] in the case. That he was the real problem, the root of the problem. That the only way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792608 - 2024-04-24
[Adam] in the case. That he was the real problem, the root of the problem. That the only way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792608 - 2024-04-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
then proceeded to a contested hearing, during which Taylor, Elizabeth Lamoreaux (Max’s case manager), and Max
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001570 - 2025-08-26
then proceeded to a contested hearing, during which Taylor, Elizabeth Lamoreaux (Max’s case manager), and Max
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001570 - 2025-08-26
[PDF]
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Frederick L. E.
has two parts. First, Frederick L.E. cites four cases from which he concludes that Dane County’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15876 - 2017-09-21
has two parts. First, Frederick L.E. cites four cases from which he concludes that Dane County’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15876 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ethelyn I.C. v. Waukesha County
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-2236 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12831 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-2236 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12831 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The centerpiece of the State’s case against Klinkenberg was security camera footage from the store where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153579 - 2017-09-21
The centerpiece of the State’s case against Klinkenberg was security camera footage from the store where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153579 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dontrell A. Leflore
) the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We affirm. I. ¶2 This case began
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5300 - 2017-09-19
) the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We affirm. I. ¶2 This case began
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5300 - 2017-09-19
Samuel Mostkoff v. Board of Bar Examiners
2005 WI 33 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 03-2640-BA Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16818 - 2005-03-31
2005 WI 33 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 03-2640-BA Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16818 - 2005-03-31