Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51641 - 51650 of 83988 for simple case search.
Search results 51641 - 51650 of 83988 for simple case search.
[PDF]
NOTICE
the sentences in this case. The Honorable Joseph R. Wall issued the order from which Ezell currently appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33049 - 2014-09-15
the sentences in this case. The Honorable Joseph R. Wall issued the order from which Ezell currently appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33049 - 2014-09-15
State v. Warren J. A.
the accusations and “the system went amuck” in Warren’s case, resulting in an incomplete investigation of other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12935 - 2005-03-31
the accusations and “the system went amuck” in Warren’s case, resulting in an incomplete investigation of other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12935 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 280, 542 N.W.2d 196 (Ct. App. 1995). ¶8 In this case, we need go no further than the first step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31509 - 2014-09-15
, 280, 542 N.W.2d 196 (Ct. App. 1995). ¶8 In this case, we need go no further than the first step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31509 - 2014-09-15
State v. Chad A. Klessig
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9364 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9364 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
their reports. The court granted the adjournment. The hearing was rescheduled and the State presented its case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102592 - 2013-09-30
their reports. The court granted the adjournment. The hearing was rescheduled and the State presented its case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102592 - 2013-09-30
[PDF]
Chippewa County v. Julie L.
that a person continues to be detained once the time limit has been violated, whereas case law establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14050 - 2014-09-15
that a person continues to be detained once the time limit has been violated, whereas case law establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14050 - 2014-09-15
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Stacey C.
, an unpublished case, as precedent for the arguments they made to this court. Neither attorney indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5007 - 2005-03-31
, an unpublished case, as precedent for the arguments they made to this court. Neither attorney indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5007 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
following his arrest, he “remained out of custody on this case until after the State filed the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106035 - 2013-12-26
following his arrest, he “remained out of custody on this case until after the State filed the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106035 - 2013-12-26
Chippewa County v. Julie L.
., suggests that a person continues to be detained once the time limit has been violated, whereas case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14050 - 2005-03-31
., suggests that a person continues to be detained once the time limit has been violated, whereas case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14050 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
they constitute a prima facie case for summary judgment. If they do, then we examine the opposing party’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131986 - 2014-12-22
they constitute a prima facie case for summary judgment. If they do, then we examine the opposing party’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131986 - 2014-12-22