Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5171 - 5180 of 20929 for word.
Search results 5171 - 5180 of 20929 for word.
Soldiers of Jesus Christ, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. Rather, the word “church” must be construed “to refer to the congregation or the hierarchy itself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15322 - 2005-03-31
. Rather, the word “church” must be construed “to refer to the congregation or the hierarchy itself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15322 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frank James Burt, Jr.
used the word “concurrent” instead of “consecutive” in its original sentence pronouncement. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15489 - 2005-03-31
used the word “concurrent” instead of “consecutive” in its original sentence pronouncement. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15489 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark R. Norlander
. That grooming can include everything from words of encouragement, words of praise, telling the child that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18379 - 2005-05-31
. That grooming can include everything from words of encouragement, words of praise, telling the child that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18379 - 2005-05-31
COURT OF APPEALS
on what the officer did not do, rather than on what the officer knew at the time. In Schiewe’s words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103338 - 2013-10-23
on what the officer did not do, rather than on what the officer knew at the time. In Schiewe’s words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103338 - 2013-10-23
COURT OF APPEALS
to allocate to Adams. ¶12 We agree with the City to a certain extent—footnote 18 is worded in a manner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51804 - 2010-07-07
to allocate to Adams. ¶12 We agree with the City to a certain extent—footnote 18 is worded in a manner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51804 - 2010-07-07
COURT OF APPEALS
by eliminating the benefits of destroying evidence.” Norris is incorrect. He would … elevate the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35666 - 2009-02-24
by eliminating the benefits of destroying evidence.” Norris is incorrect. He would … elevate the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35666 - 2009-02-24
COURT OF APPEALS
that jurors and courts may define words or interpret concepts in the statute in different ways and on the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131970 - 2014-12-22
that jurors and courts may define words or interpret concepts in the statute in different ways and on the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131970 - 2014-12-22
State v. Albert L. Black
, and accepted meaning, except that technical or specially defined words are given their technical or special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26169 - 2006-08-09
, and accepted meaning, except that technical or specially defined words are given their technical or special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26169 - 2006-08-09
State v. David A. B.
. Although the court did not use the words "reasonable cause" in explaining why it decided the psychological
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9923 - 2005-03-31
. Although the court did not use the words "reasonable cause" in explaining why it decided the psychological
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9923 - 2005-03-31
State v. James E. Robinson
is used to describe “bias that is revealed through the words and the demeanor of the prospective juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15425 - 2005-03-31
is used to describe “bias that is revealed through the words and the demeanor of the prospective juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15425 - 2005-03-31