Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51711 - 51720 of 57894 for id.
Search results 51711 - 51720 of 57894 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
control. See id., 119 Wis. 2d at 623–624, 350 N.W.2d at 639. ¶8 Marker argues that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64983 - 2011-05-31
control. See id., 119 Wis. 2d at 623–624, 350 N.W.2d at 639. ¶8 Marker argues that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64983 - 2011-05-31
City of Whitewater v. Robert P. Michor
the individual for purpose of inquiry.” Id. at 60. ¶9 Applying the law to the facts, the stop passes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4683 - 2005-03-31
the individual for purpose of inquiry.” Id. at 60. ¶9 Applying the law to the facts, the stop passes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4683 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
against that party. Id. ¶9 Stueber raises two issues in her initial appellant’s brief. First, she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338943 - 2021-02-23
against that party. Id. ¶9 Stueber raises two issues in her initial appellant’s brief. First, she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338943 - 2021-02-23
COURT OF APPEALS
is reached, however, the children’s “interests are paramount.” Id., 2006 WI 129, ¶28, 298 Wis. 2d at 19, 724
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32404 - 2008-04-14
is reached, however, the children’s “interests are paramount.” Id., 2006 WI 129, ¶28, 298 Wis. 2d at 19, 724
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32404 - 2008-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS
of probability that a new trial would produce a different result.” Id. In either case, however, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81583 - 2012-04-25
of probability that a new trial would produce a different result.” Id. In either case, however, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81583 - 2012-04-25
State v. Steven J. Royce
and that action is appropriate. Id. “The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5306 - 2005-03-31
and that action is appropriate. Id. “The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5306 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
and that the court actually relied on the inaccurate information in the sentencing.” Id., ¶26 (quotation marks
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139181 - 2015-04-01
and that the court actually relied on the inaccurate information in the sentencing.” Id., ¶26 (quotation marks
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139181 - 2015-04-01
State v. Amany E.
and the public.’” Id. at 874. We therefore cannot accept the State’s argument that the legislature’s inclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2244 - 2005-03-31
and the public.’” Id. at 874. We therefore cannot accept the State’s argument that the legislature’s inclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2244 - 2005-03-31
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Thomas M.
the evidence produced at the hearing when it granted the petition to extend the dispositional order. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15067 - 2005-03-31
the evidence produced at the hearing when it granted the petition to extend the dispositional order. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15067 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the maximum authorized by law or is otherwise subject to collateral attack.” Id. As the State points out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74190 - 2011-11-21
of the maximum authorized by law or is otherwise subject to collateral attack.” Id. As the State points out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74190 - 2011-11-21