Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51751 - 51760 of 59547 for do.
Search results 51751 - 51760 of 59547 for do.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reason for not doing so. See State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 181, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141768 - 2017-09-21
reason for not doing so. See State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 181, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141768 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
James P. Watkins v. William G. Eastman
of Watkins, and do not actually state as fact that a second shot was fired. The report itself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7979 - 2017-09-19
of Watkins, and do not actually state as fact that a second shot was fired. The report itself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7979 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
: I know you do. I crossed it off [in the written motion], but it’s not true. The presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50757 - 2010-06-08
: I know you do. I crossed it off [in the written motion], but it’s not true. The presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50757 - 2010-06-08
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
timely notice of Judge Gieringer's proper assignment. Since McClellan failed to do so, his argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8138 - 2005-03-31
timely notice of Judge Gieringer's proper assignment. Since McClellan failed to do so, his argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8138 - 2005-03-31
State v. Reginold B. Trussell
around twice DISPATCHER: okay, do you want to leave your name? CALLER: no, just as long as the guy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15732 - 2005-03-31
around twice DISPATCHER: okay, do you want to leave your name? CALLER: no, just as long as the guy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15732 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 157
was not a “person attending any vehicle collided with” because he was aiding the injured person and was not doing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29096 - 2007-06-26
was not a “person attending any vehicle collided with” because he was aiding the injured person and was not doing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29096 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on a number of cases for the proposition that the facts present here do not amount to reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275826 - 2020-08-06
on a number of cases for the proposition that the facts present here do not amount to reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275826 - 2020-08-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
impounded the defendant’s car had “not articulate[d] a constitutionally legitimate rationale” for doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72614 - 2014-09-15
impounded the defendant’s car had “not articulate[d] a constitutionally legitimate rationale” for doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72614 - 2014-09-15
State v. Gregory Jordan
] Because we affirm the trial court’s exercise of sentencing discretion, we do not address Jordan’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10995 - 2005-03-31
] Because we affirm the trial court’s exercise of sentencing discretion, we do not address Jordan’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10995 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bradley D. Muck
motion. In doing so, the trial court based its decision on its own experience, an implicit trust
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6262 - 2005-03-31
motion. In doing so, the trial court based its decision on its own experience, an implicit trust
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6262 - 2005-03-31