Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51751 - 51760 of 84028 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 51751 - 51760 of 84028 for simple case search/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
remanded. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J.[1] This case involves various statutes in the Wisconsin Consumer Act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28910 - 2007-05-08
remanded. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J.[1] This case involves various statutes in the Wisconsin Consumer Act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28910 - 2007-05-08
Debra M. Wikel v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
2001 WI App 214 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 00-3215 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3322 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI App 214 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 00-3215 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3322 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
], the defendant became very defensive and belligerent, stating, “I just remember this case and being in here. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35919 - 2014-09-15
], the defendant became very defensive and belligerent, stating, “I just remember this case and being in here. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35919 - 2014-09-15
Carol J. Salsbury v. Michael R. Miller
: "The instant case could have been avoided had the parties to the original tort suit clearly allocated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12999 - 2005-03-31
: "The instant case could have been avoided had the parties to the original tort suit clearly allocated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12999 - 2005-03-31
Michael Burk v. Gary R. McCaughtry
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0690
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13724 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0690
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13724 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prevented Oak Park from fully presenting its case; (3) Oak Park’s challenge to the zoning administrator’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180554 - 2017-09-21
prevented Oak Park from fully presenting its case; (3) Oak Park’s challenge to the zoning administrator’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180554 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
and cause remanded. No. 2006AP2976 2 ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J.1 This case involves various
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28910 - 2014-09-15
and cause remanded. No. 2006AP2976 2 ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J.1 This case involves various
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28910 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the “failure to prove the specific date of the offense is not fatal to the [S]tate’s case against [a] defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147234 - 2015-08-26
the “failure to prove the specific date of the offense is not fatal to the [S]tate’s case against [a] defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147234 - 2015-08-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ruling to allow the evidence to come in at trial. The court cited to several cases in support of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705876 - 2023-09-27
ruling to allow the evidence to come in at trial. The court cited to several cases in support of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705876 - 2023-09-27
State v. Margaret H.
. Although this case was prosecuted as a termination-of-parental rights matter, it is, in essence, a custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15591 - 2005-03-31
. Although this case was prosecuted as a termination-of-parental rights matter, it is, in essence, a custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15591 - 2005-03-31