Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51761 - 51770 of 82758 for case codes/1000.
Search results 51761 - 51770 of 82758 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
advised him of his right to file a response. Reaves has not responded. We conclude that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054644 - 2025-12-23
advised him of his right to file a response. Reaves has not responded. We conclude that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054644 - 2025-12-23
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
at the time he was sentenced in the case underlying this appeal, we affirm. ¶2 Riley was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28089 - 2007-02-12
at the time he was sentenced in the case underlying this appeal, we affirm. ¶2 Riley was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28089 - 2007-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion, arguing that he was entitled to relief based on new case law, State v. Dubose, 2005 WI 126
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113967 - 2014-06-09
postconviction motion, arguing that he was entitled to relief based on new case law, State v. Dubose, 2005 WI 126
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113967 - 2014-06-09
Mickey Critton v. Jeffrey W. Jensen
to the docket entry, the case was dismissed on June 9, 2004. The entry states: “Plaintiff NOT in court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17871 - 2005-04-25
to the docket entry, the case was dismissed on June 9, 2004. The entry states: “Plaintiff NOT in court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17871 - 2005-04-25
Gina M. McMannes v. Scott L. McMannes
financial circumstances. As explained in the cases cited by Welp, the law requires that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7037 - 2005-03-31
financial circumstances. As explained in the cases cited by Welp, the law requires that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7037 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Replacement counsel Andrew Hinkel has filed that response. We conclude that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232921 - 2019-01-15
Replacement counsel Andrew Hinkel has filed that response. We conclude that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232921 - 2019-01-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644643 - 2023-04-13
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644643 - 2023-04-13
CA Blank Order
that these cases are appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. After our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132987 - 2015-01-11
that these cases are appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. After our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132987 - 2015-01-11
State v. John W. Talbot
such a requirement in existing case law. We do not read the case law in that manner. No such requirement appears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24863 - 2006-04-19
such a requirement in existing case law. We do not read the case law in that manner. No such requirement appears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24863 - 2006-04-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to unambiguously show which theory the case was charged or pled under. ¶5 Smith argues that in light
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44894 - 2009-12-22
to unambiguously show which theory the case was charged or pled under. ¶5 Smith argues that in light
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44894 - 2009-12-22