Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51771 - 51780 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 51771 - 51780 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
concludes that these cases are appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033813 - 2025-11-04
concludes that these cases are appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033813 - 2025-11-04
[MS WORD]
PR-1901: Petition for Formal Administration
OF Name |_| Amended Petition for Formal Administration Case No. I DECLARE
/formdisplay/PR-1901.doc?formNumber=PR-1901&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-03-10
OF Name |_| Amended Petition for Formal Administration Case No. I DECLARE
/formdisplay/PR-1901.doc?formNumber=PR-1901&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-03-10
State v. Amy D. Zietlow
erred by regarding the fact that she moved in with another male while the criminal case was proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6432 - 2005-03-31
erred by regarding the fact that she moved in with another male while the criminal case was proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6432 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132801 - 2017-09-21
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132801 - 2017-09-21
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Daniel J. Kanera
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 99-0969-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17501 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 99-0969-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17501 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Tara B.
would be prejudging a case not before the court. The State may choose not to file a further petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10447 - 2017-09-20
would be prejudging a case not before the court. The State may choose not to file a further petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10447 - 2017-09-20
[MS WORD]
JD-1721: Petition Under Ch 938 - Delinquency, Protection or Services, Civil Law/Ordinances
or Services (under age 18) |_| Civil Law/Ordinances (under age 16) Case No. D.A. Case
/formdisplay/JD-1721.doc?formNumber=JD-1721&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-11-24
or Services (under age 18) |_| Civil Law/Ordinances (under age 16) Case No. D.A. Case
/formdisplay/JD-1721.doc?formNumber=JD-1721&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-11-24
07AP590 County of Fond du Lac v. Jessica Erica Thompson
traffic regulation cases and requesting reinstatement of her driver’s license. In lieu of a responsive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30262 - 2007-09-18
traffic regulation cases and requesting reinstatement of her driver’s license. In lieu of a responsive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30262 - 2007-09-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the appellant’s brief and record, I conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963012 - 2025-05-30
of the appellant’s brief and record, I conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963012 - 2025-05-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was not valid (and should not be counted as a prior conviction) because the circuit court in that case did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501705 - 2022-03-31
was not valid (and should not be counted as a prior conviction) because the circuit court in that case did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501705 - 2022-03-31