Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5181 - 5190 of 69078 for as he.
Search results 5181 - 5190 of 69078 for as he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 940.225(1)(b) and 968.075(1)(a) (2013-14). 1 He also appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203611 - 2017-11-28
, contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 940.225(1)(b) and 968.075(1)(a) (2013-14). 1 He also appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203611 - 2017-11-28
[PDF]
State v. Jose S. Soto, Sr.
, all as party to a crime.1 He also appeals from an order denying his petition for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7176 - 2017-09-20
, all as party to a crime.1 He also appeals from an order denying his petition for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7176 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
City of Middleton v. Daniel L. Barrett
) the circuit court's decision violated his due process rights because he did not have an opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10324 - 2017-09-20
) the circuit court's decision violated his due process rights because he did not have an opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10324 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Jay D. Harris
that he was denied a speedy trial. The genesis of Harris’s speedy trial claim lies in the confusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16062 - 2017-09-21
that he was denied a speedy trial. The genesis of Harris’s speedy trial claim lies in the confusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16062 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dion Matthews
, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 943.32(2) (1999-2000).[1] He argues that his statements to police were coerced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4636 - 2005-03-31
, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 943.32(2) (1999-2000).[1] He argues that his statements to police were coerced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4636 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary D. Perry
denying him postconviction relief. He raises two issues on this appeal. First, he contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10449 - 2005-03-31
denying him postconviction relief. He raises two issues on this appeal. First, he contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10449 - 2005-03-31
State v. John Foster Fant
, with intent to deliver. See §§ 161.16(2)(b)(1), 161.41(1m)(cm)(5), Stats., 1993–94.[1] He also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13116 - 2005-03-31
, with intent to deliver. See §§ 161.16(2)(b)(1), 161.41(1m)(cm)(5), Stats., 1993–94.[1] He also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13116 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Irving contends he was deprived of No. 2011AP1908-CR 2 his right to self-representation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85742 - 2014-09-15
. Irving contends he was deprived of No. 2011AP1908-CR 2 his right to self-representation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85742 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
On appeal, Franklin argues that he should be granted a new trial on the basis of newly-discovered evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114791 - 2017-09-21
On appeal, Franklin argues that he should be granted a new trial on the basis of newly-discovered evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114791 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that he should be granted a new trial on the basis of newly-discovered evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114791 - 2014-06-18
argues that he should be granted a new trial on the basis of newly-discovered evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114791 - 2014-06-18