Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5181 - 5190 of 82614 for case codes/1000.
Search results 5181 - 5190 of 82614 for case codes/1000.
Village of Hobart v. Brown County
2004 WI App 66 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-1907 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6685 - 2005-03-31
2004 WI App 66 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-1907 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6685 - 2005-03-31
Shoreline Park Preservation, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Administration
employed in EIS hearings is that of a "contested case proceeding," see Wis. Adm. Code § Adm 60.08(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8128 - 2005-03-31
employed in EIS hearings is that of a "contested case proceeding," see Wis. Adm. Code § Adm 60.08(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8128 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
§ DOC 328.21 or the above case law. [21] Wisconsin Admin. Code § DOC 328.21(1) states, General policy
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83494 - 2012-06-07
§ DOC 328.21 or the above case law. [21] Wisconsin Admin. Code § DOC 328.21(1) states, General policy
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83494 - 2012-06-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-18) and WIS. ADMIN. CODE § Ins 2.16(5)(a) (through October 2020);3 and (2) recommended an insurance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=306056 - 2020-11-19
-18) and WIS. ADMIN. CODE § Ins 2.16(5)(a) (through October 2020);3 and (2) recommended an insurance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=306056 - 2020-11-19
[PDF]
State v. Cassandra Crawford
Falls removing a Model 5630 AT&T telephone from a shelf, tearing the security code tag from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13454 - 2017-09-21
Falls removing a Model 5630 AT&T telephone from a shelf, tearing the security code tag from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13454 - 2017-09-21
State v. Cassandra Crawford
, tearing the security code tag from the phone's box, throwing the security tag in back of the shelf behind
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13454 - 2005-03-31
, tearing the security code tag from the phone's box, throwing the security tag in back of the shelf behind
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13454 - 2005-03-31
William N. Ledford v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections
(3) and (4) (1997-98)[1] and Wis. Admin. Code ch. DOC 316, as questions of law. See Pulsfus Poultry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15537 - 2005-03-31
(3) and (4) (1997-98)[1] and Wis. Admin. Code ch. DOC 316, as questions of law. See Pulsfus Poultry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15537 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James W. McCone
to submit to the test. Because the statutes and the administrative code do not support McCone’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2717 - 2017-09-19
to submit to the test. Because the statutes and the administrative code do not support McCone’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2717 - 2017-09-19
Tony Walker v. Gary McCaughtry
. The evidence was sufficient to find Walker guilty. Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 303.25 provides that “[a]ny inmate who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11944 - 2005-03-31
. The evidence was sufficient to find Walker guilty. Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 303.25 provides that “[a]ny inmate who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11944 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 22, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
requirement that a prisoner personally receive a copy of the DOC-73 form. See Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 303.81(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28526 - 2007-03-21
requirement that a prisoner personally receive a copy of the DOC-73 form. See Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 303.81(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28526 - 2007-03-21