Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5181 - 5190 of 16418 for commentating.
Search results 5181 - 5190 of 16418 for commentating.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that qualifies for adult jurisdiction.” The circuit court commented that it considered “serious” to refer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717210 - 2023-10-24
that qualifies for adult jurisdiction.” The circuit court commented that it considered “serious” to refer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717210 - 2023-10-24
COURT OF APPEALS
, “The common theme that I heard from him is you don’t have time for him.” The court also commented on Jami’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42693 - 2009-10-26
, “The common theme that I heard from him is you don’t have time for him.” The court also commented on Jami’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42693 - 2009-10-26
[PDF]
State v. Randy O. Bohardt
sentencing comments included the following: And I don't mean to over [dramatize] this, but when we see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10111 - 2017-09-19
sentencing comments included the following: And I don't mean to over [dramatize] this, but when we see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10111 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, as evidenced by various comments he made throughout the litigation expenses hearing. They argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137854 - 2015-03-18
, as evidenced by various comments he made throughout the litigation expenses hearing. They argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137854 - 2015-03-18
State v. Michael A. Sisk
to suppress. Significantly, the court commented that “the critical legal decision” it had to make was whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3075 - 2005-03-31
to suppress. Significantly, the court commented that “the critical legal decision” it had to make was whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3075 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey L. Conners
, the circuit court commented on Conners’ character, pointing out that Conners: was thirty-four years old, had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20799 - 2005-12-27
, the circuit court commented on Conners’ character, pointing out that Conners: was thirty-four years old, had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20799 - 2005-12-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
comment on DeBlare’s bond. In response to a question about whether he remembered running out of gas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181988 - 2017-09-21
comment on DeBlare’s bond. In response to a question about whether he remembered running out of gas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181988 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Columbia County Department of Human Services v. Robert L. W.
[is] not in their best interest and it is clearly contrary to their welfare.” The circuit court commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6038 - 2017-09-19
[is] not in their best interest and it is clearly contrary to their welfare.” The circuit court commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6038 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Douglas D.
precedential value to a comment the supreme court made as part of a gratuitous expression of distaste
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15718 - 2017-09-21
precedential value to a comment the supreme court made as part of a gratuitous expression of distaste
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15718 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David M. Womble
argument. No. 99-0773-CR 3 Kimes objected to Mitchell’s comment (on Womble’s behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15294 - 2017-09-21
argument. No. 99-0773-CR 3 Kimes objected to Mitchell’s comment (on Womble’s behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15294 - 2017-09-21