Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5181 - 5190 of 16451 for commenting.
Search results 5181 - 5190 of 16451 for commenting.
[PDF]
State v. Donald J. Draves
are unconvinced that the prosecutor's comments deprived Draves of a fair trial. A prosecutor may strike "hard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10720 - 2017-09-20
are unconvinced that the prosecutor's comments deprived Draves of a fair trial. A prosecutor may strike "hard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10720 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Eugene F. Line
of six months” in the county jail. Line, himself, did not comment. The court imposed consecutive six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13964 - 2014-09-15
of six months” in the county jail. Line, himself, did not comment. The court imposed consecutive six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13964 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
only a single page of transcript in his appendix, attributes this comment to the sentencing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134619 - 2015-02-09
only a single page of transcript in his appendix, attributes this comment to the sentencing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134619 - 2015-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with suggesting or procuring the actual changes to the will, and Marcia’s testimony that her only comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101602 - 2017-09-21
with suggesting or procuring the actual changes to the will, and Marcia’s testimony that her only comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101602 - 2017-09-21
Patrick McDonough v. Alan J. Muetzelburg
deferred its decision on the postverdict motions, commenting that it thought it could adjourn a decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14297 - 2005-03-31
deferred its decision on the postverdict motions, commenting that it thought it could adjourn a decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14297 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Douglas D.
precedential value to a comment the supreme court made as part of a gratuitous expression of distaste
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15718 - 2017-09-21
precedential value to a comment the supreme court made as part of a gratuitous expression of distaste
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15718 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
comments that it believed Jurjens knew exactly what he was doing when he entered his pleas, and from its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103623 - 2017-09-21
comments that it believed Jurjens knew exactly what he was doing when he entered his pleas, and from its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103623 - 2017-09-21
Roberta K. Long v. Russell S. Long
of the record satisfies us that the trial court, by its comments on the depletion of the accounts, appropriately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8136 - 2005-03-31
of the record satisfies us that the trial court, by its comments on the depletion of the accounts, appropriately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8136 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Martin asserts that, when a sentencing court’s after-the-fact comments during a postconviction hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107102 - 2017-09-21
. Martin asserts that, when a sentencing court’s after-the-fact comments during a postconviction hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107102 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert J. Capps
of reoffense.” The court’s comments show that it considered proper and relevant factors. The sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11931 - 2005-03-31
of reoffense.” The court’s comments show that it considered proper and relevant factors. The sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11931 - 2005-03-31