Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5181 - 5190 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 5181 - 5190 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Travis S. Wimpie
offense should be given is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Borrell, 167 Wis. 2d 749, 779
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4087 - 2017-09-20
offense should be given is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Borrell, 167 Wis. 2d 749, 779
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4087 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Town of Monroe v. Bowmar Appraisal, Inc.
court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3798 - 2017-09-20
court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3798 - 2017-09-20
Lawrence Turkow v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
judgment. SUMMARY JUDGMENT We review a summary judgment decision de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12383 - 2005-03-31
judgment. SUMMARY JUDGMENT We review a summary judgment decision de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12383 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
presented to the circuit court. Our analysis of what a statute requires is de novo. State v. Devries, 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73486 - 2011-11-07
presented to the circuit court. Our analysis of what a statute requires is de novo. State v. Devries, 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73486 - 2011-11-07
[PDF]
Racine County v. William R. Cape
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶6 The parties agree that the outcome of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3740 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶6 The parties agree that the outcome of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3740 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the analysis hinges on a question of statutory interpretation, which is a question of law that we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786241 - 2024-04-09
, the analysis hinges on a question of statutory interpretation, which is a question of law that we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786241 - 2024-04-09
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53008 - 2010-08-04
of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53008 - 2010-08-04
[PDF]
State v. Matthew R.L.
. Therefore, we will review de novo whether the juvenile court properly interpreted the factors listed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12080 - 2017-09-21
. Therefore, we will review de novo whether the juvenile court properly interpreted the factors listed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12080 - 2017-09-21
Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
that part of our review de novo. See Sallie T., 219 Wis. 2d at 305, 581 N.W.2d at 186. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2172 - 2005-03-31
that part of our review de novo. See Sallie T., 219 Wis. 2d at 305, 581 N.W.2d at 186. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2172 - 2005-03-31
Lake Bluff Housing Partners v. City of South Milwaukee
is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12457 - 2005-03-31
is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12457 - 2005-03-31