Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51821 - 51830 of 69077 for had.

COURT OF APPEALS
testified that once it was discovered that he had covered the camera in his cell, he was directed to put his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87550 - 2012-09-26

John "Jack" Kosky v. International Association of Lions Clubs
ceremony, parade and picnic. The club, a nonprofit organization, had a fireworks permit and oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11366 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
would not have been incurred” had Kottke pursued the appraisal process to completion.[5] With that one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37925 - 2009-07-20

Milwaukee District Council 48 v. Milwaukee County
Employees (collectively, “AFSCME”), for a declaratory judgment. AFSCME had requested the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13912 - 2005-03-31

Jay E. Zurowski v. Hobart Corporation
is a reasonable one.” Id. at 370-71. ¶8 Where the trial court has had the opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2505 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Thomas J.W.
or services pursuant to § 48.13(12), STATS., 2 in that he was a child under the age of twelve who had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12110 - 2017-09-21

Carew Concrete & Supply Co., Inc. v. Town of Humboldt
that although his plant would occupy about six acres of his thirty-five-acre plot, he had no plans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3004 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
for protection or services for the child of Kenneth S. and Jalateefah J., alleging the child had been the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33187 - 2011-06-14

State v. Randolph P. Haushalter
in West Milwaukee. He was charged with second offense OWI because he had been convicted some time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15124 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
de novo whether evidence the jury had before it was sufficient to support its verdict. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195578 - 2017-09-21