Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5191 - 5200 of 69394 for as he.
Search results 5191 - 5200 of 69394 for as he.
State v. Theodore J. Krawczyk
a judgment of conviction entered after he pled guilty to felony murder. He also appeals an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4842 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of conviction entered after he pled guilty to felony murder. He also appeals an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4842 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Harlan C. Richards
of appeals under § 974.02 and RULE 809.30, STATS., his first or direct appeal. He argued that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9119 - 2017-09-19
of appeals under § 974.02 and RULE 809.30, STATS., his first or direct appeal. He argued that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9119 - 2017-09-19
State v. Harlan C. Richards
or direct appeal. He argued that the trial court erred in (1) denying his motion for a new trial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9119 - 2005-03-31
or direct appeal. He argued that the trial court erred in (1) denying his motion for a new trial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9119 - 2005-03-31
State v. Nathaniel Crampton
for postconviction relief. He contends that the trial court should not have answered without his and his lawyer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13383 - 2005-03-31
for postconviction relief. He contends that the trial court should not have answered without his and his lawyer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13383 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dion Matthews
, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 943.32(2) (1999-2000).[1] He argues that his statements to police were coerced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4636 - 2005-03-31
, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 943.32(2) (1999-2000).[1] He argues that his statements to police were coerced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4636 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assault and fourth-degree sexual assault, both as a repeater. He also appeals from the order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762853 - 2024-02-14
assault and fourth-degree sexual assault, both as a repeater. He also appeals from the order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762853 - 2024-02-14
State v. Gary D. Perry
denying him postconviction relief. He raises two issues on this appeal. First, he contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10449 - 2005-03-31
denying him postconviction relief. He raises two issues on this appeal. First, he contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10449 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jose S. Soto, Sr.
imprisonment, and false imprisonment while armed, all as party to a crime.[1] He also appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7176 - 2005-03-31
imprisonment, and false imprisonment while armed, all as party to a crime.[1] He also appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7176 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Middleton v. Daniel L. Barrett
) the circuit court's decision violated his due process rights because he did not have an opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10324 - 2017-09-20
) the circuit court's decision violated his due process rights because he did not have an opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10324 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Jay D. Harris
that he was denied a speedy trial. The genesis of Harris’s speedy trial claim lies in the confusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16062 - 2017-09-21
that he was denied a speedy trial. The genesis of Harris’s speedy trial claim lies in the confusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16062 - 2017-09-21