Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5191 - 5200 of 50070 for our.

State v. Ricky A. Myhre
on appeal and after the subsequent trial the court imposed an increased sentence. Based on our supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25935 - 2006-07-18

Charles R. and Marybelle Bentley v. City of Madison
disagree with each of these assertions, but we do not address them further inasmuch as our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14569 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Sarah Alderman v. Topper A1 Beer & Liquor
. See WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2); Mullen v. Walczak, 2003 WI 75, ¶11, 262 Wis. 2d 708, 664 N.W.2d 76. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6557 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Yediael Y. Backstrom
office. In reviewing a motion to suppress an inculpatory statement, our standard of review is mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25049 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Timothy L. Kaelin
of a lineup. However, as our supreme court has noted, a crime scene confrontation, proximate in time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8017 - 2017-09-19

Charlene M. Potkay v. City of Marinette
judgment, our analysis is independent of the trial court's determination. We apply the standards set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8741 - 2005-03-31

Platten Developments, LLC v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
). Accordingly, we turn our attention to whether the Commission properly determined that Platten Developments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26335 - 2006-08-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that order. Noting that our jurisdiction over a motion for reconsideration is limited to review of issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197436 - 2017-10-05

[PDF] NOTICE
.” No. 2009AP2020 2010AP160 3 ¶2 On the appeals: (1) we hold that our disposition of the 2010AP160
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58528 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
fair market value requirement in light of our conclusion that the duplexes at issue do not fall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815731 - 2024-06-19