Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5191 - 5200 of 83742 for simple case search/1000.

[PDF] Mabel A.O. v. Conservatorship of Mabel A.O.
. Nos. 99-0384 99-0490 99-0610 3 ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case arises from conservatorship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15169 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
WI 51, ¶39, 235 Wis. 2d 325, 611 N.W.2d 659. On review, we search the record for credible evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40102 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in a particular case.’” Id., ¶22 (quoted source omitted). In the context of a traffic stop, “such a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250652 - 2019-11-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to search the defendant’s vehicle because “no assertion [was] made in this case that [the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676439 - 2023-07-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence based on a challenge to the search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=781850 - 2024-03-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a warrantless search of his vehicle.2 ¶2 We disagree and, therefore, affirm. BACKGROUND ¶3 On June 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247727 - 2019-10-01

[PDF] NOTICE
Harris recently, but it was not a search or seizure suppression case. See State v. Ferguson, 2009 WI 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62022 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
) (a search case) (citing Walker, 154 Wis. 2d at 186-87). The supreme court was presumably aware of Harris
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62022 - 2011-03-28

[PDF] State v. Jack P. Lindgren
2004 WI App 159 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-1868-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6668 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Jack P. Lindgren
2004 WI App 159 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-1868-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6669 - 2017-09-20