Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51921 - 51930 of 82791 for case codes/1000.
Search results 51921 - 51930 of 82791 for case codes/1000.
State v. Donald J. Johnson
begin on the date of remittitur” of the battery and reckless endangerment case, and further conceded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8844 - 2005-03-31
begin on the date of remittitur” of the battery and reckless endangerment case, and further conceded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8844 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
rise to a reasonable inference that Rosenthal was “casing” the premises2 and, thus, Oberg had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70617 - 2014-09-15
rise to a reasonable inference that Rosenthal was “casing” the premises2 and, thus, Oberg had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70617 - 2014-09-15
Malcolm K. H. v. Michael R. Phegley
, 103, 362 N.W.2d 118, 124 (1985). In the recent supreme court case of Paige K.B. v. Molepske, 219 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13491 - 2005-03-31
, 103, 362 N.W.2d 118, 124 (1985). In the recent supreme court case of Paige K.B. v. Molepske, 219 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13491 - 2005-03-31
Ray A. Peterson v. Mark Baker
to demonstrate a reasonable prospect of success on the merits if the case were reopened. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5501 - 2005-03-31
to demonstrate a reasonable prospect of success on the merits if the case were reopened. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5501 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 12, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appe...
, or that evidence which was improperly received “clouded a crucial issue” in the case. See State v. Hicks, 202 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80889 - 2012-04-11
, or that evidence which was improperly received “clouded a crucial issue” in the case. See State v. Hicks, 202 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80889 - 2012-04-11
COURT OF APPEALS
had received favorable treatment in his own case after implicating Brown. We conclude that counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70432 - 2011-08-31
had received favorable treatment in his own case after implicating Brown. We conclude that counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70432 - 2011-08-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not appear that this file is before us in this case. We decline to simply assume that the 1997 circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69078 - 2014-09-15
not appear that this file is before us in this case. We decline to simply assume that the 1997 circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69078 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ronald G. Nadolski
for the same offense. State v. Kurzawa, 180 Wis.2d 502, 515, 509 N.W.2d 712, 717 (1994). In this case, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9696 - 2017-09-19
for the same offense. State v. Kurzawa, 180 Wis.2d 502, 515, 509 N.W.2d 712, 717 (1994). In this case, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9696 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 222
2007 WI APP 222 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP2301-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30332 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 222 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP2301-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30332 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
entered by the trial court in resolution of his small claims case against Anita
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247231 - 2019-09-24
entered by the trial court in resolution of his small claims case against Anita
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247231 - 2019-09-24