Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51931 - 51940 of 56185 for n y c.
Search results 51931 - 51940 of 56185 for n y c.
COURT OF APPEALS
corroborating Anderson’s version of the arrest. The trial court, the Honorable Elsa C. Lamelas, denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36378 - 2009-05-04
corroborating Anderson’s version of the arrest. The trial court, the Honorable Elsa C. Lamelas, denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36378 - 2009-05-04
State v. Diane M. Somers
, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), Stats. [2] Indeed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11460 - 2005-03-31
, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), Stats. [2] Indeed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11460 - 2005-03-31
Harry J. Wesolowski v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
language from Litton: “[C]ontractual obligations will cease, in the ordinary course, upon termination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16034 - 2005-03-31
language from Litton: “[C]ontractual obligations will cease, in the ordinary course, upon termination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16034 - 2005-03-31
State v. Alisha M. Olson
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: patrick C. haughney, Judge. Affirmed. Before Nettesheim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3388 - 2005-03-31
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: patrick C. haughney, Judge. Affirmed. Before Nettesheim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3388 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that established under 42 U.S.C. § 9902 (2) [the poverty line]. …. (c) If the parties were married, the standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35309 - 2009-01-27
that established under 42 U.S.C. § 9902 (2) [the poverty line]. …. (c) If the parties were married, the standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35309 - 2009-01-27
Yolanda Springfield-Woodard v.
shall be deposited in one or more identifiable trust accounts as provided in paragraph (c) maintained
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17103 - 2005-03-31
shall be deposited in one or more identifiable trust accounts as provided in paragraph (c) maintained
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17103 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was not prejudicial. C. Testing toy gun and wallet for fingerprints. ¶10 Martin claims his trial lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82109 - 2012-05-07
was not prejudicial. C. Testing toy gun and wallet for fingerprints. ¶10 Martin claims his trial lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82109 - 2012-05-07
Donald S. Eisenberg v.
) The petitioner has not practiced law during the period of suspension or revocation. (c) The petitioner has
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16842 - 2005-03-31
) The petitioner has not practiced law during the period of suspension or revocation. (c) The petitioner has
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16842 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. §§ 943.32(2); 939.50(3)(c). The assaults by a prisoner each carry a maximum potential sentence of three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44871 - 2009-12-21
. §§ 943.32(2); 939.50(3)(c). The assaults by a prisoner each carry a maximum potential sentence of three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44871 - 2009-12-21
State v. Matthew D.
in a violent, aggressive, premeditated or wilful manner, and its prosecutive merit. (c) The adequacy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13399 - 2005-03-31
in a violent, aggressive, premeditated or wilful manner, and its prosecutive merit. (c) The adequacy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13399 - 2005-03-31