Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51971 - 51980 of 68851 for had.
Search results 51971 - 51980 of 68851 for had.
Mark Olsen v. Edward Hoffmann
for a frivolous appeal if the “‘party or party’s attorney knew, or should have known, that the appeal … [had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24751 - 2006-04-10
for a frivolous appeal if the “‘party or party’s attorney knew, or should have known, that the appeal … [had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24751 - 2006-04-10
State v. Dennis Rude
cases. He contends that if this had been done, he would have entered pleas of not guilty and would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9835 - 2005-03-31
cases. He contends that if this had been done, he would have entered pleas of not guilty and would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9835 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michael F. Mullen v. Cedar River Lumber Company
on his two-way radio that a motor vehicle accident had occurred. Mullen drove to the accident scene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3284 - 2017-09-19
on his two-way radio that a motor vehicle accident had occurred. Mullen drove to the accident scene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3284 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be enforced through mandamus. Greene moved for reconsideration, arguing that the court had overlooked
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=461376 - 2021-12-09
be enforced through mandamus. Greene moved for reconsideration, arguing that the court had overlooked
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=461376 - 2021-12-09
[PDF]
State v. Roland A. Smart
for Smart’s offense to 120 days in jail. This had also been the recommended penalty before January 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4996 - 2017-09-19
for Smart’s offense to 120 days in jail. This had also been the recommended penalty before January 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4996 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jorge T.
is that of prosecutorial merit. Because Jorge stipulated that the waiver petition had § 938.18(4)(a) prosecutorial merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14190 - 2005-03-31
is that of prosecutorial merit. Because Jorge stipulated that the waiver petition had § 938.18(4)(a) prosecutorial merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14190 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 13
the Marital Settlement Agreement because it had not been approved by the Jefferson County Child Support Agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34652 - 2009-01-27
the Marital Settlement Agreement because it had not been approved by the Jefferson County Child Support Agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34652 - 2009-01-27
[PDF]
State v. Duane R. Bull
and signed a plea questionnaire stating that he had completed high school, he understood his rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11558 - 2017-09-19
and signed a plea questionnaire stating that he had completed high school, he understood his rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11558 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Bradley Lee Bearheart, Jr.
conclusion that the State had jurisdiction to prosecute him even if there is no double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11578 - 2017-09-19
conclusion that the State had jurisdiction to prosecute him even if there is no double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11578 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
interest, the value of which would be determined by Mark Frankel, who had conducted the mediation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46519 - 2010-02-01
interest, the value of which would be determined by Mark Frankel, who had conducted the mediation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46519 - 2010-02-01