Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51981 - 51990 of 68851 for had.

[PDF] State v. Duane R. Bull
and signed a plea questionnaire stating that he had completed high school, he understood his rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11558 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Bradley Lee Bearheart, Jr.
conclusion that the State had jurisdiction to prosecute him even if there is no double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11578 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
interest, the value of which would be determined by Mark Frankel, who had conducted the mediation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46519 - 2010-02-01

Production Stamping Corporation v. Maryland Casualty Company
that had migrated from the Production Stamping property onto the Faber property.” Biederman filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14453 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
that the defendant had sexual intercourse or contact with the victim. Third-degree sexual assault requires proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32211 - 2008-03-25

State v. David M. Womble
also raised his hand acknowledged that he too was a police officer and that he had similar contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15294 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
on an annual basis. In early 2011, M&I had the Golf Club’s real estate appraised and it was valued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108789 - 2014-03-10

Michael S. Zeller v. Dennis D. Stockel
that the court’s alternative ruling, that the Zellers would have been entitled to equitable relief had the contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18186 - 2005-05-17

Timothy J. Lipke v. Tri-County Area School Board
. In his complaint, Lipke alleged that throughout the entire 1995-96 school year, he had the highest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12318 - 2005-03-31

State v. Venus M. Manns
seek a criminal conviction under § 343.44(2) against a defendant who had violated § 343.44(1) on more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11019 - 2005-03-31