Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51991 - 52000 of 61668 for judgment.
Search results 51991 - 52000 of 61668 for judgment.
COURT OF APPEALS
‘was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable’ so as to represent ‘its will and not its judgment’”; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55425 - 2010-10-12
‘was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable’ so as to represent ‘its will and not its judgment’”; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55425 - 2010-10-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=873996 - 2024-11-12
, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=873996 - 2024-11-12
CA Blank Order
for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily affirmed pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98401 - 2013-06-24
for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily affirmed pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98401 - 2013-06-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record discloses no other potential issue for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210041 - 2018-03-20
of the record discloses no other potential issue for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210041 - 2018-03-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Alexis Omar West appeals from a judgment of conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195127 - 2017-09-21
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Alexis Omar West appeals from a judgment of conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195127 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Tony Shaw v. Gary R. McCaughtry
, oppressive or unreasonable and represented the committee’s will and not its judgment, and (4) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14091 - 2014-09-15
, oppressive or unreasonable and represented the committee’s will and not its judgment, and (4) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14091 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 55
independent judgment, made in good faith, that the new evidence is not of such nature as to trigger
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36849 - 2014-09-15
independent judgment, made in good faith, that the new evidence is not of such nature as to trigger
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36849 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) the evidence was such that it might reasonably make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34526 - 2008-11-05
and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) the evidence was such that it might reasonably make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34526 - 2008-11-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no-contest pleas. The motion was denied. The judgments of conviction and order denying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169031 - 2017-09-21
no-contest pleas. The motion was denied. The judgments of conviction and order denying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169031 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Leroy Moore
denied the motion, and this court affirmed the judgment of conviction and the postconviction order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25070 - 2017-09-21
denied the motion, and this court affirmed the judgment of conviction and the postconviction order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25070 - 2017-09-21