Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51991 - 52000 of 74899 for public records.
Search results 51991 - 52000 of 74899 for public records.
State v. Michael A. Henderson
were ineffective for not challenging the sentence on that basis. Because the record conclusively shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18070 - 2005-05-09
were ineffective for not challenging the sentence on that basis. Because the record conclusively shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18070 - 2005-05-09
James L. Ard v. Patricia A. Ard
search the record for reasons to sustain the circuit court’s discretionary decision, not for evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25724 - 2006-07-04
search the record for reasons to sustain the circuit court’s discretionary decision, not for evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25724 - 2006-07-04
CA Blank Order
on this appeal. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110459 - 2014-04-14
on this appeal. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110459 - 2014-04-14
2011 WI APP 25
the Record is devoid of evidence “‘of a conflict that made counsel’s continued representation untenable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59282 - 2011-02-15
the Record is devoid of evidence “‘of a conflict that made counsel’s continued representation untenable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59282 - 2011-02-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the record. In response, Walker’s attorney—who had just been assigned to the case— said if Walker wants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659655 - 2023-07-13
on the record. In response, Walker’s attorney—who had just been assigned to the case— said if Walker wants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659655 - 2023-07-13
James Weiss v. United Fire and Casualty Company
sufficient evidence in his case in chief to establish a bad faith claim. Our review of the record, as set
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16889 - 2005-03-31
sufficient evidence in his case in chief to establish a bad faith claim. Our review of the record, as set
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16889 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 25
) (“If the record discloses that the judgment or order appealed from was entered after the notice of appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59282 - 2014-09-15
) (“If the record discloses that the judgment or order appealed from was entered after the notice of appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59282 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the report and has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117130 - 2017-09-21
to the report and has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117130 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the hearsay exception for business records, WIS. STAT. § 908.03(6), is not satisfied when the only affiant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155709 - 2017-09-21
that the hearsay exception for business records, WIS. STAT. § 908.03(6), is not satisfied when the only affiant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155709 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
was not ineffective. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
was not ineffective. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17