Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 521 - 530 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 521 - 530 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
a motion for reconsideration that resulted in a change in the valuation of his business. He also contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54380 - 2010-09-13
a motion for reconsideration that resulted in a change in the valuation of his business. He also contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54380 - 2010-09-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
2 property and debts.1 He argues that the trial court erred in granting a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54380 - 2014-09-15
2 property and debts.1 He argues that the trial court erred in granting a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54380 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
making required under an award of joint legal custody.” Sec. 767.41(2)(b), (2)(b)2.c. The statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736880 - 2023-12-07
making required under an award of joint legal custody.” Sec. 767.41(2)(b), (2)(b)2.c. The statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736880 - 2023-12-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
making required under an award of joint legal custody.” Sec. 767.41(2)(b), (2)(b)2.c. The statute
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736880 - 2023-12-07
making required under an award of joint legal custody.” Sec. 767.41(2)(b), (2)(b)2.c. The statute
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736880 - 2023-12-07
Fire Insurance Exchange v. Cincinnati Insurance Company
liability for it under any theory. We conclude that the Hirschfields and RCHS may be joint tortfeasors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15434 - 2005-03-31
liability for it under any theory. We conclude that the Hirschfields and RCHS may be joint tortfeasors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15434 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Fire Insurance Exchange v. Cincinnati Insurance Company
conclude that the Hirschfields and RCHS may be joint tortfeasors under theories of negligence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15434 - 2017-09-21
conclude that the Hirschfields and RCHS may be joint tortfeasors under theories of negligence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15434 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
David B. v. Stephanie C.S.
, providing for joint legal custody, primary placement with David, and periods of alternate physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5711 - 2017-09-19
, providing for joint legal custody, primary placement with David, and periods of alternate physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5711 - 2017-09-19
David B. v. Stephanie C.S.
6, 1998, providing for joint legal custody, primary placement with David, and periods of alternate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5711 - 2005-03-31
6, 1998, providing for joint legal custody, primary placement with David, and periods of alternate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5711 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Sande D.-O. v. Paul E.K.
sole or joint legal custody under sub. (2), the court shall allocate periods of physical placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12746 - 2017-09-21
sole or joint legal custody under sub. (2), the court shall allocate periods of physical placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12746 - 2017-09-21
Linda M. Heath-Miller v. Mark A. Miller
were divorced in August 2000. The divorce decree provided for joint legal custody of their children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5478 - 2005-03-31
were divorced in August 2000. The divorce decree provided for joint legal custody of their children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5478 - 2005-03-31