Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 521 - 530 of 84706 for daniel stoffel obit wi.
Search results 521 - 530 of 84706 for daniel stoffel obit wi.
State v. Daniel T. Winkler
of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Daniel T. Winkler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15277 - 2005-03-31
of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Daniel T. Winkler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15277 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel W. Harr
-RESPONDENT, V. DANIEL W. HARR, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11822 - 2017-09-21
-RESPONDENT, V. DANIEL W. HARR, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11822 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). No. 2023AP2343 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Daniel P. Silvey appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1081561 - 2026-02-25
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). No. 2023AP2343 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Daniel P. Silvey appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1081561 - 2026-02-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
considered Daniel’s wishes. See Margaret H., 234 Wis. 2d 606, ¶35. We will not review the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859352 - 2024-10-08
considered Daniel’s wishes. See Margaret H., 234 Wis. 2d 606, ¶35. We will not review the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859352 - 2024-10-08
Jackie L. DuBois v. Daniel T. DuBois
All of Daniel’s military retired pay was subject to division at divorce, see Cook, 208 Wis. 2d at 175
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26108 - 2006-08-08
All of Daniel’s military retired pay was subject to division at divorce, see Cook, 208 Wis. 2d at 175
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26108 - 2006-08-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
. State, 65 Wis. 2d 648, 654, 223 N.W.2d 455 (1974). We conclude Daniels’ trial counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60101 - 2014-09-15
. State, 65 Wis. 2d 648, 654, 223 N.W.2d 455 (1974). We conclude Daniels’ trial counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60101 - 2014-09-15
State v. Daniel L. Litsey
of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Daniel L. Litsey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11957 - 2005-03-31
of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Daniel L. Litsey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11957 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58349 - 2010-12-27
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58349 - 2010-12-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence. Accordingly, the circuit court found Daniel unfit under WIS. STAT. § 48.424(4). ¶8 The cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747363 - 2024-01-03
evidence. Accordingly, the circuit court found Daniel unfit under WIS. STAT. § 48.424(4). ¶8 The cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747363 - 2024-01-03
[PDF]
State v. Michael Daniels
Power & Light Co., Inc., 162 Wis.2d 1, 30, 469 N.W.2d 595, 606 (1991). First, Daniels claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9988 - 2017-09-19
Power & Light Co., Inc., 162 Wis.2d 1, 30, 469 N.W.2d 595, 606 (1991). First, Daniels claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9988 - 2017-09-19