Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5201 - 5210 of 16425 for commenting.
Search results 5201 - 5210 of 16425 for commenting.
COURT OF APPEALS
, “The common theme that I heard from him is you don’t have time for him.” The court also commented on Jami’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42693 - 2009-10-26
, “The common theme that I heard from him is you don’t have time for him.” The court also commented on Jami’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42693 - 2009-10-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
involuntarily. ¶13 Warrior, however, directs our attention to a comment made by the State. During its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89201 - 2014-09-15
involuntarily. ¶13 Warrior, however, directs our attention to a comment made by the State. During its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89201 - 2014-09-15
State v. Stephen S.
for certain circumstances beyond Stephen's control, the trial court commented that Stephen “tends just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11009 - 2005-03-31
for certain circumstances beyond Stephen's control, the trial court commented that Stephen “tends just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11009 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
have no such evidence.” However, it appears the court made this comment as part of its general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181686 - 2017-09-21
have no such evidence.” However, it appears the court made this comment as part of its general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181686 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Columbia County Department of Human Services v. Robert L. W.
[is] not in their best interest and it is clearly contrary to their welfare.” The circuit court commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6039 - 2017-09-19
[is] not in their best interest and it is clearly contrary to their welfare.” The circuit court commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6039 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
for failing to object to the prosecutor’s repeated comments during closing argument that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28982 - 2014-09-15
for failing to object to the prosecutor’s repeated comments during closing argument that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28982 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, attributes this comment to the sentencing court. In reality, it was a comment by the assistant district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134619 - 2017-09-21
, attributes this comment to the sentencing court. In reality, it was a comment by the assistant district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134619 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
known about the first offer based upon the court’s additional comments that it believed Jurjens knew
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103623 - 2013-10-27
known about the first offer based upon the court’s additional comments that it believed Jurjens knew
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103623 - 2013-10-27
COURT OF APPEALS
period. The trial court also commented on the fact that when Lavender was on probation for his crimes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98285 - 2013-06-24
period. The trial court also commented on the fact that when Lavender was on probation for his crimes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98285 - 2013-06-24
State v. Gregory A. Allen
called expert witnesses to comment on the discrepancies in the State’s case. Counsel cannot be faulted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13713 - 2005-03-31
called expert witnesses to comment on the discrepancies in the State’s case. Counsel cannot be faulted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13713 - 2005-03-31