Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5201 - 5210 of 40024 for financial disclosure statement.

[MS WORD] CR-293: Order for Reimbursement for Costs of Representation (Chapter 980)
. The respondent |_| is |_| is not financially able to reimburse for some or all of the costs of representation
/formdisplay/CR-293.doc?formNumber=CR-293&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2020-12-01

COURT OF APPEALS
standard: (a) The financial resources of the child. (b) The financial resources of both parents. …. (bp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35309 - 2009-01-27

[PDF] NOTICE
) factors that would have permitted it to deviate from the percentage standard: (a) The financial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35309 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] William C. Frazier v. Jeffrey W. Senglaub
Wanasek, an attorney, also acted as a financial advisor to the Fraziers regarding the events at issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19977 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 100
from WIS. STAT. § 973.20 to order that restitution be paid from all financial resources available
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33019 - 2014-09-15

2008 WI APP 100
of these factors is a defendant’s financial resources. ¶12 We observe that Wis. Stat. § 973.20 does not limit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33019 - 2008-07-29

William C. Frazier v. Jeffrey W. Senglaub
as to whether Wanasek, an attorney, also acted as a financial advisor to the Fraziers regarding the events
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19977 - 2005-10-18

[PDF] 2025XX001330 - 2025-11-25 Court Order (Denied Recusal of Justice Crawford)
. § 757.19(2)(f), which requires recusal “[w]hen a judge has a significant financial or personal interest
/supreme/docs/25xx1330crawford.pdf - 2025-11-25

[PDF] State v. Timothy Taylor
was not dicta, it was an incorrect statement of the law. Here again, the trial court cited the Barnes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10594 - 2017-09-20

State v. Timothy Taylor
. Third, the trial court ruled that even if Lipke was not dicta, it was an incorrect statement of the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10594 - 2005-03-31