Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5201 - 5210 of 64826 for records.
Search results 5201 - 5210 of 64826 for records.
State v. Jeffery L. Ware
. Upon our independent review of the record,[1] we conclude that no arguable appellate issues exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11919 - 2005-03-31
. Upon our independent review of the record,[1] we conclude that no arguable appellate issues exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11919 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and lacked a reasonable basis. Based upon our review of the brief and record,1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242928 - 2019-06-26
and lacked a reasonable basis. Based upon our review of the brief and record,1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242928 - 2019-06-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 2023AP2320-NM 2023AP2321-NM 2 an independent review of the record as required by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760113 - 2024-02-06
. 2023AP2320-NM 2023AP2321-NM 2 an independent review of the record as required by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760113 - 2024-02-06
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
noted. No. 2011AP1814-CRNM 2 Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95275 - 2014-09-15
noted. No. 2011AP1814-CRNM 2 Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95275 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the question on the record and the prosecutor indicated no objection. There is nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65821 - 2011-06-14
the question on the record and the prosecutor indicated no objection. There is nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65821 - 2011-06-14
COURT OF APPEALS
agreement as it was described on the record at the plea hearing. Further, Lietz’s attorney testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92929 - 2013-02-18
agreement as it was described on the record at the plea hearing. Further, Lietz’s attorney testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92929 - 2013-02-18
Marathon County v. Terry R.H.
, based on the subject individual’s treatment record, that the individual would be a proper subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12794 - 2005-03-31
, based on the subject individual’s treatment record, that the individual would be a proper subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12794 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shah N. Mian
on the record of the trial and postconviction hearing. Without trial court findings on the issue of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15276 - 2005-03-31
on the record of the trial and postconviction hearing. Without trial court findings on the issue of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15276 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103691 - 2017-09-21
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103691 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Samantha M. Penkoske
crime-free record, her unremarkable role in the crime, the ringleader’s prior record, and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12230 - 2017-09-21
crime-free record, her unremarkable role in the crime, the ringleader’s prior record, and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12230 - 2017-09-21