Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5201 - 5210 of 17024 for search wicourts.gov.
Search results 5201 - 5210 of 17024 for search wicourts.gov.
State v. Towanka S. King
pocket. Hicks and King were taken into custody. The officers then searched King and found a Motorola
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19811 - 2005-10-03
pocket. Hicks and King were taken into custody. The officers then searched King and found a Motorola
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19811 - 2005-10-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
the traffic stop and that he did not voluntarily give his consent to the subsequent search of his vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46270 - 2014-09-15
the traffic stop and that he did not voluntarily give his consent to the subsequent search of his vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46270 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
search of his vehicle. We affirm the judgments.[2] ¶2 On May 14, 2008, State Trooper Kyle Amlong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46270 - 2010-01-26
search of his vehicle. We affirm the judgments.[2] ¶2 On May 14, 2008, State Trooper Kyle Amlong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46270 - 2010-01-26
[PDF]
Float-Rite Park, Inc. v. Village of Somerset
). ¶4 Float-Rite argues that § 11.09(4) authorizes nonconsensual, warrantless administrative searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2699 - 2017-09-19
). ¶4 Float-Rite argues that § 11.09(4) authorizes nonconsensual, warrantless administrative searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2699 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Towanka S. King
. The officers then searched King and found a Motorola telephone, $2,386, and a set of keys. ¶4 After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19811 - 2017-09-21
. The officers then searched King and found a Motorola telephone, $2,386, and a set of keys. ¶4 After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19811 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Paul J. VanLaarhoven
that the police were required to obtain a search warrant before submitting his blood sample for testing. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3537 - 2017-09-19
that the police were required to obtain a search warrant before submitting his blood sample for testing. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3537 - 2017-09-19
State v. Paul J. VanLaarhoven
a search warrant before submitting his blood sample for testing. We reject his argument and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3537 - 2005-03-31
a search warrant before submitting his blood sample for testing. We reject his argument and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3537 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffry D. Paterson
the community caretaker exception to the search warrant requirement. We therefore reverse the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12755 - 2017-09-21
the community caretaker exception to the search warrant requirement. We therefore reverse the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12755 - 2017-09-21
State v. Will E. Edwards
search informant Fleetwood to establish that he possessed no drugs; Fleetwood would then enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13834 - 2005-03-31
search informant Fleetwood to establish that he possessed no drugs; Fleetwood would then enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13834 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffry D. Paterson
under the community caretaker exception to the search warrant requirement. We therefore reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12755 - 2005-03-31
under the community caretaker exception to the search warrant requirement. We therefore reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12755 - 2005-03-31