Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5201 - 5210 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.

State v. Scott K. Schaefer
pat down. He states that clearly the purpose of the search in this case was a pat-down frisk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9840 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Scott K. Schaefer
the purpose of the search in this case was a pat-down frisk for weapons as opposed to a search incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9840 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
). Holloway contends that Roehl lacked reasonable grounds to conduct a search in this case because Roehl did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57806 - 2010-12-20

[PDF] NOTICE
. 2006). Holloway contends that Roehl lacked reasonable grounds to conduct a search in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57806 - 2014-09-15

Wisconsin Court System - Circuit court forms
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/forms1/circuit/ccform.jsp?Category=79&FormName=&FormNumber=&StatuteCite=&SubCat=Termination+of+Parental+Rights+(Voluntary+or+Involuntary+-+ICWA)&beg_date=&end_date=

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to justify a protective search in a particular case. See State v. Buchanan, 2011 WI 49, ¶9, 334 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196988 - 2017-09-26

[PDF] NOTICE
an officer had reasonable suspicion to effectuate a protective search for weapons in a particular case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34399 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
search for weapons in a particular case.” The requirement that an officer conducting a protective search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34399 - 2008-10-27

[PDF] WI APP 124
2007 WI APP 124 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP1625-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28363 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Antwon C. Mathews
, that the consent to search in this case was invalid because Williams was illegally "seized" when he gave
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16480 - 2017-09-21