Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5201 - 5210 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 5201 - 5210 of 58340 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Corey J. Wiseman
postconviction motion. Wiseman presents four issues for our review: first, whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8348 - 2017-09-19
postconviction motion. Wiseman presents four issues for our review: first, whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8348 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
and 2013TP35) Before Kessler, J.[1] Bennie O. appeals from trial court orders terminating his parental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138016 - 2015-03-17
and 2013TP35) Before Kessler, J.[1] Bennie O. appeals from trial court orders terminating his parental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138016 - 2015-03-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
imposing the maximum available time for reconfinement. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52530 - 2014-09-15
imposing the maximum available time for reconfinement. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52530 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
imposing the maximum available time for reconfinement. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52530 - 2010-07-26
imposing the maximum available time for reconfinement. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52530 - 2010-07-26
COURT OF APPEALS
to a new trial because some members of the jury may have seen him in shackles as the jury returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85157 - 2012-07-24
to a new trial because some members of the jury may have seen him in shackles as the jury returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85157 - 2012-07-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
specifying a particular length of imprisonment. After an extensive plea colloquy, the trial court accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43576 - 2014-09-15
specifying a particular length of imprisonment. After an extensive plea colloquy, the trial court accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43576 - 2014-09-15
John C. Buellesbach v. Mark W. Roob
from a judgment entered in their favor against Mark W. Roob. The Buellesbachs challenge only the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26026 - 2006-07-31
from a judgment entered in their favor against Mark W. Roob. The Buellesbachs challenge only the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26026 - 2006-07-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
for resentencing. The single issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51410 - 2014-09-15
for resentencing. The single issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51410 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
John C. Buellesbach v. Mark W. Roob
in their favor against Mark W. Roob. The Buellesbachs challenge only the trial court’s calculation of damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26026 - 2017-09-21
in their favor against Mark W. Roob. The Buellesbachs challenge only the trial court’s calculation of damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26026 - 2017-09-21
State v. Sandra W.
that she received ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and that the trial court erred when it refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3286 - 2005-03-31
that she received ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and that the trial court erred when it refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3286 - 2005-03-31